After just 594 miles, George's brand-new 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 faced a shocking engine failure—what happened next will leave you frustrated.
The thrill of driving a brand-new truck can quickly turn into frustration when something goes wrong—especially within the first few hundred miles. That’s exactly what happened to George from Owings, Maryland, who purchased a 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Custom with the 2.7L TurboMax engine. Just 594 miles into ownership, George encountered a major engine issue that required a trip back to the dealership. Disappointed with how the situation was handled, George shared his story in the comments section of Edmunds' 2024 Chevy Silverado 1500 review.
Here’s what George wrote:
"Just bought a Silverado Custom with the 2.7 TurboMax 4-cylinder. With 594 miles on it, it starts shaking and shimmying at a light. Hit the gas, and the engine is shaking like crazy. I took my Silverado back to the dealer, and it turned out that two cylinders needed to be replaced! Heritage Chevrolet in Owings Mills, MD, would not switch out the truck for a new one. I am beyond vexed because that truck will never be the same. I couldn't care less about a warranty. How about doing right by your customers and taking back a defective product and fighting it out with GM for sending you a bad truck! The customer always gets the short end of the stick."
Watch why is George feeling disheartened and how could the dealership act in the following video from the Torque News Youbue Channel.
This situation raises significant concerns for truck buyers. After all, purchasing a brand-new vehicle should offer peace of mind and reliability, not costly and time-consuming repairs. George’s frustration with Heritage Chevrolet is rooted in his belief that the dealership should have replaced the truck outright instead of repairing it, given the major defect so early in its life. But why didn’t the dealership take that step?
Why the Dealership Repaired the Truck Instead of Replacing It
From the customer’s perspective, it’s easy to see why George is upset. A major repair like replacing two cylinders feels like a red flag for a truck with less than 600 miles on the odometer. However, dealerships operate under strict guidelines set by manufacturers like General Motors. Here’s why Heritage Chevrolet may have opted to repair the Silverado instead of replacing it:
- Manufacturer Policies on Replacement: Most automakers, including GM, prioritize repairing vehicles under warranty over outright replacement. Dealers are contractually obligated to follow GM’s warranty guidelines, which often dictate that vehicles must undergo repair attempts before a replacement is even considered.
- Cost of Replacement: Replacing a vehicle is a costly process, and manufacturers often resist doing so unless absolutely necessary. Instead, they prefer to address specific issues through repairs. For a dealership, escalating a replacement request to the manufacturer could be met with significant pushback.
- "Lemon Law" Standards: While George’s truck had a major issue, it likely didn’t meet the legal criteria for a “lemon” under Maryland’s Lemon Law. In most cases, a vehicle must undergo multiple unsuccessful repair attempts or remain out of service for an extended period before qualifying for a replacement or buyback.
- Warranty Coverage: The warranty, which George dismisses in his comment, is designed to address exactly these types of defects. From the dealership’s point of view, they fulfilled their obligation by diagnosing and repairing the issue under warranty.
Why George Feels Let Down
For George, the key issue isn’t just the defect itself but the long-term implications of such a repair. A brand-new Chevy Silverado that has undergone significant engine work so early in its life can lead to lingering doubts about its reliability and resale value. George’s sentiment that the truck “will never be the same” resonates with many vehicle owners who have experienced similar situations.
His frustration with Heritage Chevrolet is compounded by a feeling that the dealership could have taken a more customer-centric approach. Offering to escalate the issue with GM, providing a loaner vehicle during the repair process, or showing empathy for his situation might have softened the blow. Instead, George feels like he’s been left to deal with the fallout of a defective product.
Balancing the Perspectives
While George’s experience is undoubtedly frustrating, it’s worth noting that dealerships often have limited control in these situations. They act as intermediaries between customers and manufacturers, following corporate policies that don’t always align with customer expectations.
That said, George’s comment also highlights an area where dealerships can improve: customer communication and advocacy. Explaining the constraints they face, offering a timeline for repair completion, and reassuring customers about the quality of post-repair performance can go a long way toward rebuilding trust.
Takeaways for Other Truck Buyers
George’s experience underscores the importance of thoroughly researching warranty policies, dealership reviews, and vehicle reliability before making a purchase. It also serves as a reminder to document any issues with your vehicle and stay informed about your rights under local Lemon Laws.
For automakers like GM, cases like this should be a wake-up call. While the 2.7L TurboMax engine has been praised for its power and efficiency, early reports of reliability issues can erode consumer confidence. Addressing these concerns proactively—whether through better quality control or more flexible replacement policies—would help rebuild trust.
What’s Been New in the 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500?
The 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 arrives with a handful of updates that, while not groundbreaking, enhance the appeal of Chevy’s popular full-size pickup. Here’s a breakdown of what’s new this year:
- Fresh Paint Options: Chevy has introduced two new metallic paint colors—Lakeshore Blue and Slate Gray—giving buyers more customization options to suit their style.
- TurboMax Name for 2.7L Engine: The Silverado’s 310-horsepower 2.7-liter four-cylinder engine gets a new name: "TurboMax." While the engine remains unchanged, the branding highlights its robust performance for a smaller powerplant.
- Active Exhaust for 6.2L V-8 Models: Silverados equipped with the 420-hp 6.2-liter V-8 now come with an active exhaust system. This feature delivers a throatier, more aggressive engine note when you switch to Sport mode, adding a bit more personality to the driving experience.
-
Expanded Appearance Packages:
- The Midnight Edition, previously exclusive to other trims, is now available on the luxurious High Country trim. This package adds blacked-out accents and wheels for a bold, stealthy look.
- The Blackout Appearance Package can now be added to Custom, Custom Trail Boss, RST, and LT Trail Boss trims, giving these models a sleeker, more aggressive aesthetic.
- Standard Tech Upgrades Across the Board: OnStar connectivity and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are now standard features on all Silverado trims, even the base Work Truck. This ensures that even the most budget-friendly models are equipped with modern tech for safety and convenience.
These updates may not constitute a radical redesign, but they bring meaningful enhancements that bolster the Silverado’s competitiveness in a crowded segment. With its refreshed options, improved standard tech, and attention to style, the 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 continues to appeal to both work-focused and lifestyle-oriented buyers.
George’s story is a cautionary tale for anyone buying a new vehicle. His frustration is palpable, and his comment highlights a critical gap between customer expectations and dealership realities. While Heritage Chevrolet may have followed GM’s policies to the letter, this situation illustrates the need for a more empathetic approach to customer service—one that prioritizes trust and satisfaction over technicalities.
What do you think? Should dealerships have more flexibility to replace vehicles with major defects? Or is the repair-first approach justified? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Armen Hareyan is the founder and the Editor in Chief of Torque News. He founded TorqueNews.com in 2010, which since then has been publishing expert news and analysis about the automotive industry. He can be reached at Torque News Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, and Youtube. He has more than a decade of expertise in the automotive industry with a special interest in Tesla and electric vehicles.
I feel the guy's pain and…
I feel the guy's pain and understand completely. GM could have given the dealer permission to replace the entire engine instead of repairing the engine that failed. I agree that customers always seem to come up short. Come on GM. I hate buying any new vehicle because of stories like this. This is one of many I read on a daily basis. GM should review this and give the guy a break. I would feel the same way if it happened to me.
there was a guy on Long Is…
there was a guy on Long Is and that had problems with his new VW. So he covered it with lemon decals and parked across from the dealer every weekend
Who in their right mind…
Who in their right mind would purchase a full size truck with a turbo four cylinder engine.
The same people who tailgate…
The same people who tailgate me everyday in their enormous trucks that have never carried an oz of cargo in their lives...
Had A GMC THAT HAD A PROBLEM…
Had A GMC THAT HAD A PROBLEM WITH A FAULTY FUSE BOX. WOULD ON SPARATICALLY OCATIONS OPEN AND UNLOCK DOORS ETC. ACTED LIKE IT WAS POCESSED . MY MECHANIC AND I CHANGED OUT THE FUZE BOX THAT SOLVED THE PROBLEM BUT DEALERS WOULD NOT OWN UP TO THE PROBLEM. THERE LOSS.
If the dealer or…
If the dealer or manufacturer cannot see it reasonable to replace the Pick Up the least they should have to do is replace the engine with a brand new crate engine. That way at the least your not getting a piece together engine that may or may not turn out the mileage the Pick Up would have been capable of in the start.
As harsh as it sounds to GM…
As harsh as it sounds to GM. They should replace the vehicle. A new or repaired engine on a vehicle that has less miles than a demo, which this could become or the Sales managers vehicle, with today's internet tracking of repairs and wrecks (Carfax) this truck just took a huge hit in value if sold or traded. I wouldn't buy a truck that was broke from the start. I saw this same problem when Ford went to the 6.0 Powerstroke. It put a lot of small companies out of business because the trucks stayed down and when repaired no one would take the chance on them. Corporate America is just greedy and could care less about the consumers. I haven't bought a new truck in 20 years just for this reason. The last one I bought had the tried and true 7.3 Turbostroke and it still broke at 23k. Although, minor I was still down for 10 days.
If you had purchased a Ford,…
If you had purchased a Ford, you wouldn’t need to worry about your vehicle wearing out. Fords don’t last that long.
The truck merely has only…
The truck merely has only 594 miles, it’s a no brainer. They can sort out the technical issues with the manufacturer directly on the side while they should have replaced the truck and gained customer’s trust and loyalty.
My family was a GMC dealer…
My family was a GMC dealer for many years. Our solution would likely have been to give the customer a GM protection plan extended warranty to 75k at no cost to the customer. It would give him more confidence, a free loaner if needed, and extra value if he should choose to trade it in as the warranty is transferrable.
Out of all the comments this…
Out of all the comments this 1 seems like it would be the best course of action for both the consumers and suppliers. People telling the dealer to take a defective truck back and give the customer another truck fail to see what type of loss your asking the dealer to take.
We own the same truck and if…
We own the same truck and if that happened to us we'd take the truck and leave it at the dealership rent a car and get a lawyer. No way I'm paying 48000. For a truck and this happens. No way. They should back their product better with their customers. We had a Colorado z71 we bought new and the sun roof leaked and after 3 attempts to replace it and fix the problem the lemon law kicked in. But I always recieved a loaner. And they gave me an excellent upgrade when the lemon law replaced it. So it is via the dealerships that depends on how you get what you deserve.
I am so sorry that George is…
I am so sorry that George is going through this situation and exactly why I won't be buying a new truck since dealerships are extremely irresponsible and from doing research all year long throughout America in search of a Chevy Silverado High Country 4x4 in a White Diamond Iridescent or Radiant Red with Brown leather seats. I unfortunately have had encounters with Dealerships that are all about making a profit and are not concerned about the warranty on the truck. It's been my experience that you don't ask about warranty's in detail they will not submit but let me tell you this. The Dealerships are always willing to Tack On FRIVOLOUS CHARGES that have nothing to do with the truck to include on my Trade In they treat like a piece of junk worth only peanuts to them when in fact they forget I am selling a Top of the line BMW in immaculate condition which they could careless because at the End of the Day they will make 10 to 18k profit on it and they always comeback say I have negative equity. That has gotten so old that these dealerships and manufacturers need to STOP with the tactics of pointing the finger at each other and take responsibility for A LEMON 🍋. This is one of the issues President Trump needs address since the cost of vehicles is out the roof and at a Nose Dive for failure because people are going to just STOP BUYING. This is America so STOP SHAFTING YOUR FELLOW AMERICAN
Telling him they have to…
Telling him they have to replace only 2 cylinders is BS. Not done. At minimum, the short block will be have to be replaced, possibly the head as well if it’s damaged.
I believe, the more money a…
I believe, the more money a person spends on an item, or product, the better it should be, also leading the consumer to stray away from thinking about the Chances of anything going wrong, or getting additional insurance, especially trying to reason with if the price of insurance is worth the cost. The consumer should not be frustrated when the product they purchased did not last very much, and that is the chance they took. No matter how a consumer looks at it, where a person buys something, the seller , dealership has the final say in the situation.
A person can be frustrated, but that's where things end. Showing empathy, instead of proving the sellers , or dealerships policy is a good step in de-escalating a frustration, and possibly maintaining a customers loyalty , and respect. Trying to help the customer continue on with their busy schedule, even if they can not provide a complimentary temporary replacement would also show that an employee is making an effort to be helpful. I believe that would travel far in a heartfelt situation.
They should not hesitate to…
They should not hesitate to replace it. They didn’t hesitate taking his hard earned money. That’s why I quit buying chevys too many problems with they’re new cars
George should have filed a…
George should have filed a claim with GM customer service group. You’ve now engaged the corporate group with the dealership. You’ll have a claim number and now requires communication between those two units. His out come may have not changed but it now on record involving corporate and the local dealership and the problem with this truck.
I had a 2024 Silverado High…
I had a 2024 Silverado High Country with less than a 1000 miles on it and it wouldn’t start unless you disconnected the negative battery terminal and reinstalled it. Dahlstrom Motors from Oslo Minnesota replaced it with a new one and all I had to pay was $2000 for the miles I had on the old one.
Dealership should have…
Dealership should have rolled out the red carpet!! Loaner vehicle, explained their GM policy, and dropped a brand new motor in truck. Also allowed to trade in vehicle if customer is not completely satisfied at value plus 10%.
In the headline, "could care…
In the headline, "could care less" means you actually care about warrenty. "Could not care less" is what you meant to say.
I would have Traded the…
I would have Traded the Truck
back in to the Dealer and Demanded to get a full refund and bought a New Truck from that Dealership or a different Dealership
I have looked at Chevy a few…
I have looked at Chevy a few times, but they have always came off as cheap compared to Dodge, Ford or Toyota! I am glad I bought Toyota Tacoma over Chevy. 90,000 miles later, no problems.
I have liked the looks of Chevy trucks though. Now know Chevrolet won't back up it's product and my feelings about it being cheap built; proving true. Come on less then couple hundred miles already broke. And Chevy will not replace it! Shame on Chevrolet!!! I will never buy a Chevy just because this proves they are not to ever be trusted! Actually they deserve to go bankrupt over this failure! I feel for this man! It would be rough.
Shame on you Chevrolet, proves you don't care about your customers.
Never ever Chevy!
Impossible to replace any…
Impossible to replace any cylinder in an engine block.. perhaps the pistons but 2 would be a very odd failure.
Not necessarily. Some newer…
Not necessarily. Some newer engines have individual cylinder sleeves that are merely clamped between head & crankcase. The Northstar V8 that GM used in some older Caddys was a prime example of this method. Those engines weren't very reliable & had a habit of blowing head gaskets. It's possible the Turbomax engine was made using the same method, & this would explain replacing only 2 cylinders. They should have replaced the entire engine.
Sounds like you're defending…
Sounds like you're defending the dealership. Note to customers, don't buy a Chevy. A friend of mine had similar issues with his truck.