The Z is a 2 seat DEDICATED
The Z is a 2 seat DEDICATED sports car. There's nothing wrong with its price. What's wrong is the American cost of living, vs American wages vs People being able to afford this type of car. The pricing on the Z is set as such that the average person making $80k a year could afford this car. Truth is, most people making $80k have chosen to have families. So a car like this, is basically a dream. At best they can buy a v6 muscle car where they can fit 2 small children for a weekend. In a family situation the Z would have to be a 3Ed car which most people can't afford to buy or insure.
Single men making 80k a year tend to care about what women think about their car, where the Z tends to be less impressive. Men will buy entry level BMW & MB over a dedicated sports car, leaving both single and married men making over $100k a year to truly be able to afford a DEDICATED sports car. The Cayman and corvette tend to have higher brand presence to people with money. In other words. American people care more about what people think than how a car truly performs. The Z provides more handling and feedback than any competitors, yet people don't acknowledge that. They acknowledge NAV is outdated. And that's the problem with today's so called enthusiast.
The Z fits a very small niche of people who care about handling. It really aligns with the Lotus Evora 400 and Alfa Romeo 4C. Also the Porsche Cayman which is the most computer controlled and less emotional of the competing 3. But the status Quo can't admit that cuz suggestive advertising keeps the drones nice n dumb. Rattling off what the last guy said instead of experiencing the truth for themselves.