Skip to main content

Add new comment

Richard (not verified)    November 2, 2014 - 8:57AM

In reply to by billy mcphee (not verified)

The only indication that you may be an engineer would be your inability to write in paragraphs and express your ideas clearly. Certainly, as stream of consciousness rants go, this one was interesting. Next time, perhaps drop the excessive use of exaggeration to make your points. It substantially subtracts from the credibility of your post.

I certainly get that you like 6 cylinders, it's a personal choice. However the manner in which you write off 4 cylinder engines is simply over the top. I should mention that most of the dozen or so reviews I have read for the TLX recommend the 4 cylinder as the best combination of driving dynamics and value. Usually, most car reviewers will automatically gravitate to the 6 over the four when reviewing models that offer both choices, so that speaks well of the TLX 2.4.

Perhaps you believe it's your mission to educate the masses about what we should purchase, particularly when it comes to engine choice. I have only owned 4 cylinder cars in my life, haven't had an accident for over 40 years, so to suggest that 4 cylinders are "dangerous" is patently absurd….unless of course, you drive like an obnoxious "Look at me, I'm a performance driver" " donkey opening. Ah, there's the rub!

By the way, I will be buying a new TLX 2.4 Tech shortly, have driven it extensively, and find that it has lots of power for any type of driving. If only there were fewer drivers like you on the road.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.