Skip to main content

Add new comment

DrivingBy (not verified)    April 8, 2015 - 12:23AM

In reply to by Mark Robinson (not verified)

That's probably a good choice to fit in the current market.

Personally, if I wanted a diesel, I'd want at least 4 L, as diesels don't (well, traditionally they don't) suffer as much fuel economy loss when operating at light loads ==> you don't have to shrink the diesel to get efficiency. Ford had the 6.9 and 7.3 F150 years back, those were fuel efficient with far older technology than today's engines. Of course they were also loud and belched out a bunch of particle cr-p that sticks in your lungs.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.