Skip to main content

Add new comment

mckillio (not verified)    November 14, 2016 - 6:29PM

In reply to by Dana (not verified)

You're all over the place. You said the 2006 was lighter, it's not. 3,075lbs compared to 2,974lbs for the '17. The 2016 is lightly lighter in some trims, 2,955 for the base but it's heavier in the top trims. I don't see much point in comparing the 2.5, it hasn't been an option for over a generation now and it probably never will be again. So if I think the 1.6T should be an option then I'm going to compare it to the 2.0, 168hp to 152hp, and 186ft/lb to 145ft/lb and it will have a better mpg rating and possibly be better in real driving too. Anyone complaining about turbolag these days is nitpicking. They put a lot of effort into the new 2.0 so I don't see why they wouldn't bring over those same changes to the 1.6T, most of the work has already been done.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.