Skip to main content

Add new comment

Over the clock (not verified)    February 22, 2018 - 9:57AM

"Mr. Williams reasonably believed this practice to be illegal and/or fraudulent."

Then...

"...was aware of a practice of Defendants involving receiving vehicles designated as "lemons" and, with this knowledge, reselling these vehicles without branding the titles of these vehicles or offering disclosure, rather representing the cars as "used" or a "demo/loaner.""

Pretty sure that Lemon law is a state-by-state variance, and just because an item is labeled as a 'lemon' doesn't mean that it can't be resold; it just has to be accepted as a viable return (minus being impacted by standard return windows) to the manufacturer. Offering it as a "Used" vehicle holds no legal water here, and them using it as a Loaner is...totally within their rights.

Quite a straw-grabbing case.

Additionally, please note the verbiage here indicates that Tesla "fixed" issues before delivery of the vehicle, and that this is an 'opinion' of Mr. Williams to be deceptive business practice.

This case will be thrown out, I have no doubt. There isn't a single manufacturer that doesn't do this. Not only cars, but technology hardware, and SAAS as well.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.