Skip to main content

Add new comment

bac (not verified)    March 19, 2020 - 6:21PM

Here's what you are forgetting. The 3.6 is smooth, powerful, less time between plug firings, is proven over many years and no timing belt to change. On the other hand, you have a 2.4 that has historic valve cover leaks, revs really high, is noisy, has turbo heat problems, and requires a timing belt change. I'll stick with the 3.6 Boxer thank you. I'm getting 27mpg overall, if you don't believe me I'll send you a picture of my Eco Monitor. You've been outbacked.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.