Skip to main content

Add new comment

Subaru Gets A New Favorable Ruling In The WRX STI 2.5L Engine Failure Lawsuit

Subaru gets a new ruling in the latest WRX STI 2.5-liter turbocharged engine failure class-action lawsuit. See why the court ruled in Subaru’s favor.

The Subaru WRX STI 2.5-liter turbocharged Boxer engine failure class-action lawsuit is not over yet. Torque News reported last year, Subaru of America wanted to settle the lawsuit and move on and asked the U.S. District Judge Joseph Rodriguez in Camden, N.J to grant preliminary approval for the settlement. A report from Bloomberg Law says the judge has issued final approval to that motion after a recent hearing on December 5, 2019.

The plaintiffs in last year’s lawsuit represented by attorneys Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, contend the 2.5-liter turbo engine in some 2012-2017 Subaru WRX and WRX STI performance cars had a defect which allowed contaminated oil to carry “damaging metal debris through the engines” and Subaru knowingly sold the cars with defective parts that led to engine failure. The motion says "Plaintiffs alleged that defendants were aware of this engine defect, but failed to disclose it to consumers.”

2012-2017 Subaru WRX STI, WRX, Subaru 2.5-liter engine failure lawsuit2012 Subaru WRX STI sedan

The U.S. District Court in New Jersey on Dec. 5, has now given Subaru of America a more favorable ruling in the case. The judge ruled two of the three plaintiffs who brought the lawsuit against Subaru can’t proceed with breach of express warranty claims because they didn’t show that the alleged defect was covered under Subaru’s limited warranty for defects in materials and workmanship, or that the warranty was unconscionable.

Two of the plaintiffs will not be able to proceed with breach of implied warranty claims because the 2.5-liter turbocharged engines in their WRX STIs allegedly failed outside of the applicable warranty period. A third named plaintiff, however, may proceed with warranty claims under New York law as well as claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the court said. The plaintiffs may proceed with fraud claims.

2012-2017 Subaru WRX STI, WRX, Subaru 2.5-liter engine failure lawsuit2016 Subaru WRX STI

The plaintiffs will go forward with negligent misrepresentation claims because there are sufficient facts when the plaintiffs purchased or leased the vehicles, they incurred expenses after the engine failed and can claim loss of value. The class-action lawsuit filed in 2018 is seeking class certification on behalf of buyers of more than 250,000 2012-2017 Subaru WRX STI vehicles sold in the U.S. that were manufactured between October 2011 and November 2016.

What should you do if you own a 2012-2017 Subaru WRX/STI?

Anyone who leased or purchased a 2012-2017 Subaru Impreza WRX or WRX STI with an EJ-series 2.5-liter turbocharged engine is eligible to get settlement benefits. Your WRX/STI must be manufactured between October 11, 2011, and November 16, 2016, with bearing vehicle identification numbers (VIN) ending with CG203168 and up for 5-door models, and CG006225 through H9826807 for 4- door models.

The settlement allows for WRX/STI owners to receive from $3,500 up to $6,500 if they experienced “engine failure” and if it was repaired at an independent repair shop, but you must produce your receipts. WRX/STI owners who had engine repairs made at an authorized Subaru dealer can get 100 percent reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. Subaru is also extending the powertrain warranty up to an additional eight years on the 2012-2017 models or up to 100,000 miles.

You Might Also Like: More Next-Generation 2021 Subaru WRX STI Details Surface

Denis Flierl has invested nearly 30 years in the automotive industry in a variety of roles. All of his reports are archived on our Subaru page. Follow Denis on FacebookTwitterInstagramSubaru Report. Check back tomorrow for more Subaru news and updates!

Leave your comments below, share the article with friends and tweet it out to your followers!

Photo credit: Subaru USA

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.