Skip to main content

Add new comment

no one (not verified)    December 22, 2019 - 12:36AM

A lot of levels of suck overlapping things. Brand expansion might be tolerable.

-does Ford consider their interest base so shallow they couldn't relate to heritage another way? Model E, even Edsel, maybe Thunderbird, or find a new name?

-is GM also that dumb? (stupid question).
-a Vette brand: rebirth the Impala name as the performance crossover. a 4-door car would need to redeem Corvair, definitely.

-real Muscle crossovers would be accepted well.

-the EV car hype seems to often be shallow. Any wow performance clickbait really only highlights the reluctance/cheapness of GM/Ford to make AWD with their best power.

-the wedding of phone-zombie techies to the BEV idea is arbitrary. Two independent developments. People I'd expect otherwise might find the business side of electric drive just as distasteful as tradition propulsion.

-Those people being sold on sports/performance getting a car that reduces engagement, is less visceral, weaker on continuous high draw/track/towing. Ironically choosing more tradition luxury values.

-Maybe luxury values is really just buying status symbols. The car business is more truly noble when they cultivate enthusiasm.

-Wall Street playing shameless pimp for the money nobility, as usual, sucks as usual.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.