This is just another play to
This is just another play to reduce varity. This is just a bunch of B S ! Soon they will all look the same. I've read this crap before. When Toyota and GM merged soon they looked the same. When GM and land rover merged poof it's amazing how they didnt keep the uniqueness in design or looks. And then we have the example of huge corporations not being able to respond in a positive manner to a screw up in design. Tske for example pontiac was unique and a good brand for ever. Good looks good durability. Fun to drive. Then came the final f@@k up the Aztec. That had to have been corps goal make something ugly and kill the brand. Same with olds. Good stuff but corps heavy hand killed that with treating it like a red headed step child. What's next Buick? Caddy? Chevy? Gmc? Not to many left to kill off. We dont want to be driving a car that looks like everybody elses car. What I dont understsnd is what part of this do you not understand? GM Toyota? Or land rover? And now subaru. I think that merger is a fail in judgement! And history backs me up! Hows this for a novel idea, when sales fall off due to a bad build. Instead of merging or killing it off like pontick was. Maybe if the buying public was asked what do you think our new car should look like? Oh by the way the 67 GTO is still an excellent car it's got uniuqnes curves muscle and it didnt look like a buick apollo that borrowed the nova and changed the grill. Another screw up. But and another good example of done right the trans am up to about 1979 then it became crap. But corporate got involved and shared platforms to try to save $$$ but in the end it cost them. And then Plymouth was decent but dodge decided to share platforms and change the grill and tail lights and soon Plymouth was killed off. Anybody seeing a pattern here? Before long subaru and toys will be sharing platforms and before long Subaru will be killed off. Maybe the board if directors at subaru got hit with the Corona virus? And ain't thinking right