Skip to main content

Add new comment

Don (not verified)    May 10, 2021 - 2:00PM

After reading the article and the comments (most, at least), it seems that the problem is insufficient windshield manufacturing specifications by Subaru or a lack of quality control (QA/QC) by Subaru. Proper specs should include that the installed windshield will meet all of the requirements for EyeSight to properly functioning. It seems that Subaru is mostly interested in increasing the number of bells and whistles than in providing quality for those bells and whistle that can be made customer and cost friendly; Subaru should be constructing windshields that are of sufficient quality for EyeSight to function properly, ie, sloppy specs yields sloppy manufacturing and increased cost to the buyers to maintain the installed systems. For cost comparisons, the SafeLite cost in Alaska is $1725 including recalibration for a 2020 Forester.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.