Thank you for your comment
Thank you for your comment calling me "stupid". I will not lower myself to your level and start my comment with an insult. Having undertaken clinical psychological testing recently, as required for my profession, and being proven to be in the top 3% of intelligence on the planet negates your assumption. It appears that the term "Supercar" is open to personal interpretation. your CAPITALIZATION of the word "very" is laughable. My father was production director on the McLaren F1, I saw them most days when I was younger and visited him at work, the roadcars, GTRs, LMS, shorttails, longtails, the lot. Does the fact that I saw them so often mean that they are not "Supercars"? My interpretation of the word "Supercar" would be something like this: "A high performance vehicle, of striking design, not based on an already existing platform". The 911 does not meet 2 of my criteria, so will never be regarded as a "Supercar" by me, and most of the other car enthusiasts on the planet, it seems, period. There will always be exceptions. I have owned 7 Porsches (5 of them 911 turbos), 2 Ferraris and 2 Lamborghinis. Putting a more powerful engine in an already existing platform and introducing more aerodynamic devices does not "magically" move said vehicle into the "Supercar" club, no matter the increase in performance. People are different and at the end of the day, neither your, or my thoughts on the matter are of importance. If something puts a smile on your face, you can call it whatever you like.