Julius, Teslas are not
Julius, Teslas are not perfect. Neither are the competitors. The issue is that this particular article has some serious issues with credentials. The "expert" who has never subjectively looked at a Tesla, never driven one, makes some rather erroneous claims backed with hearsay and weak arguments. A car is "dangerous" because the people in the back seat can't shoot a steady video? Really? Would he say the same thing about a sports car such as a BMW or Porsche or Audi? Doubtful.
The Ford is a good first effort for an EV. The article itself would be better if it wasn't fraught with BS and had simply stuck with independently reviewing the Mach-E.