No kidding, right? Why do
No kidding, right? Why do Popular Science, CNN, the New York Times, and all those other respected publications noted in the story bother reporting on such nonsense? I do understand inductive energy transfer. No need to do any math, I put the energy lost to inductive charging losses in the terawatts (mentioned in the story). Although I have seen cars with propellers many times, I don't think they are aimed at energy efficiency. Mostly goofy boat/cars. Thanks for your comment, Rich. Please be sure you circle back to all the source links and tell them how dumb you think the idea they are portraying as a reality is.