Skip to main content

Add new comment

LocTrang (not verified)    March 23, 2025 - 12:54PM

Lucid Customer Service has confirmed that the windshield tinting was the culprit, meaning this isn’t a manufacturing defect, it’s an issue caused by the tinting process itself.

The installation fluid likely seeped into the dashboard, damaging critical electronics. This isn’t surprising since tinting a windshield requires a significant amount of liquid, and if not properly controlled, it can easily find its way into sensitive components.

Since this isn’t a factory defect, warranty won’t cover the $7,000 repair cost, leaving the owner to foot the bill. This serves as a warning for anyone considering windshield tinting, it’s risky, and installers must be extremely careful to prevent liquid damage.

This article spreads misinformation about Lucid, which could be misleading to readers and harmful to Lucid’s reputation.

Lucid Customer Service has confirmed that the issue was caused by windshield tinting, not a manufacturing defect. If the article falsely implies that Lucid is responsible, that’s factually incorrect and could damage the company’s image.

Additionally, the author misrepresents the car’s pricing and trim level—a Lucid Air Pure costs $69,900, not the Touring at $79,900, and calling it a six-figure car is simply wrong. The picture is also is a Sapphire not a Touring or a a Pure...These errors show poor research, and if there are mistakes in these basic details, there are likely more inaccuracies throughout the article.

If Lucid chooses to respond, and if the misinformation is severe enough, they may have grounds for legal action.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.