I like the challenge. The
I like the challenge. The only pure ICE technology that has a chance is the split-cycle engine with air hybrid, in my opinion. Already, Scuderi Engine has shown tests in the area of 65 mpg. Tour Engine is another offering.
I take issue, though, with that slip-in comment in the teaser that it will keep us addicted to oil, as if that's a forever condition, which it is not. And speaking of addiction, why are we using lithium and not zinc? Electrification is growing, but even the government admits that by 2030 at least 80% of cars will still be ICE. Oh how awful, though; as if green cars do not plug-in to the same grid which uses oil and coal. So, give me a break!
In this case, the reduction would be so much greater as in fuel sipping that it would surely lessen our need for foreign oil; and we all know that's a major hurdle. Furthermore, the technology would be used for nat-gas as well, which we definitely have plenty of; and would buy us time until we get off the green addiction to expensive and dangerous lithium. Finally, it would energize a cost basis that ALL would avail, not just the affluent who can afford BMW 3s but choose to buy Volts on our tax subsidies, which the masses cannot afford to access.
Just remember the automakers cannot make a decent profit on lithium-based EVs. They are too expensive for the masses; and it's the masses that affect less pollution, not the few who can afford Volts and Leafs. So, I find any ICE tech that empowers the masses to afford a more efficient step in the transportation goals has my vote. And if you want green to grow, then support zinc-air batteries which the masses will be able to afford.