Skip to main content

Add new comment

Josh Freeman (not verified)    February 29, 2012 - 2:27PM

In reply to by Aaron Turpen

Aaron you are mistaken. It is not about the milage, it is about how a story has been co-opted by corporations to sell things that are antithetical to the meaning of the story itself.

If your argument is that getting better gas mileage means slowing global warming, I can understand your indignation. But you miss the point that dying slower is still dying.

By example, an argument about whether to drive a Ford or Chevy truck is disingenuous because the real discussion is, 'How do we safely, effectively and enjoyably move things from A to B.'

A discussion about a less, but still polluting vehicle in this context is a lesser of two evils argument.

If your intention is to vent your frustrations with name calling, so be it. But if your intention is to have a conversation that leads to a solution, you might rethink your style.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.