Skip to main content

Add new comment

kimtom (not verified)    October 29, 2012 - 10:26AM

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I agree with posts. a poor" man's roadster." keep it affordable. retain simplistic design, isn't that what appealed to people? Minis are expensive for what you get. you want to WIN in market. PRICE, PRICE, You can win with design, or practicality, style , or price. (quality always a must) but not all 4. (rare)
Mazda hit a big win. don't go copy someones else's design!!!! like Ford GM did with Chryslar (van, truck, PT) Chryslar led (past tense) in design, but not in quality! I owned all but ford, I like my 05 miata in design. (mix of XKE, viper, corvette) Last point.: original idea was triump, MG, spitfire philosophy,stay with it. (would love to see a retro- roadster by someone.)
signed, former auto engineer.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.