To keep credibility, we must
To keep credibility, we must be careful how we answer questions as well as the facts we present. Electric cars are only ready for a niche market today, and as much as I would like to see them catch on we can do more damage than good if we try to convince people that EVs are right for them when they’re not.
Examples: in the “Too expensive” category – the relatively few electric cars on the road today have not yet provided enough data to support the assumption that “the operational cost for an electric car is much less than the operational cost for a gas car.” It is true that fuel costs are cheaper, but maintenance and repair costs are not proven. We should point out that maintenance costs could be lower due to fewer moving parts, but at the same time we should acknowledge that EVs have more complex electronics than ICE cars and could require more expensive service since fewer technicians have the training to work on them.
“Limited range”: I agree that people need to evaluate just how much range they truly need, but “40 mile or so” is not realistic for many people. Range is also shortened by topology, road speeds, weather, and battery age. Don’t assume that a finite number (like 40 miles) makes EVs practical for “the majority of people”.
“It takes too long to charge”: don’t forget that fast charging can significantly shorten battery life. Until battery replacement cost come down this can be a significant concern. However, many EV drivers may find that they do not need full charges every time.
Anyway, overall I love your approach. Just be careful not to promise too much too quickly.