Tesla Adopts a New, Aggressive Cybertruck Sales Strategy, Begins Advertising $74,490 Starting Price

Work for Torque News, follow on Twitter, Youtube and Facebook.

Tesla has adopted a new much more aggressive Cybertruck sales strategy as it tries to reach new buyers. Tesla is directly reaching out to people who have never shown interest towards the all-electric truck and is advertising a lower $74,490 price.

Tesla’s days of worrying about ramping up Cybertruck production to meet the pent-up demand are over. Now, the question has shifted to whether the company can sell the Cybertrucks it is producing.

The biggest proof that the heydays of Cybertruck sales have ended comes from Tesla’s updated Cybertruck sales policy.

Kerry Guthery, who posted about the issue on the Tesla Cybertruck group on Facebook, first noticed the new, more aggressive Cybertruck sales strategy.

Here is what Kerry wrote…

“My wife just got an email from Tesla inviting her to purchase a Cybertruck. She never made a reservation or otherwise expressed any interest in purchasing one. She is, however, a previous Tesla owner.”

Below the post, Kerry included a screenshot of the communication his wife received from Tesla titled “Cybertruck All-Wheel Drive and Cyberbeast Are Here”

Tesla’s full email reads…

“Take on challenging terrain with four-wheel steering for easy handling, included differential lockers, off-road modes, optional all-terrain tires for increased traction, and additional gear to keep your adventure going.

Order yours, starting at $74,490* after estimated gas Savings.”

After advertising the $74,500 starting price in large bold font, Tesla adds a disclaimer, likely written by the legal department. Here is what the much smaller fine print reads…

“*Cybertruck starts at $82,235 including Order and Destination Fees, excluding taxes and other fees. Gas savings of $5,500 estimated over 5 years. Price subject to change. Vehicle shown includes additional upgrades.”

Putting the $74,500 starting price aside for a minute, it’s still surprising that Tesla is directly reaching out to people who have never shown any interest in the all-electric truck.

However, as reported recently, only 2.5% of Cybertruck reservation holders ultimately decided to purchase the vehicle, as Tesla officially retired the over 1 million Cybertruck reservation lists in the US.

Now, rather than relying on Cybertruck preorders, Tesla has to actively seek out new buyers to purchase the vehicle.

At this point, some of you might be wondering how the Cybertruck can have a demand problem when it is the best-selling electric truck in the US. The answer is twofold.

First, Cybertruck was meant to compete against internal combustion trucks, not electric trucks. When you compare Cybertruck sales against the Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Ram 1500, Toyota Tacoma, and Tundra, the Cybertruck is nowhere near in competition with these trucks.

This wouldn’t have been an issue on its own. Cybertruck production is still ramping up, and based on the growth, reasonable people can infer that Cybertruck sales will eventually catch up to the top ICE truck sales.

However, this brings us to our second point. As already mentioned, even at the recently lowered $79,990 starting price, less than 3% of Cybertruck reservation holders are willing to purchase the truck.

There was a lot of optimism that a lot of the reservation holders were waiting for the Foundation Series program to end before purchasing a Cybertruck.

However, despite Tesla lowering the starting price by $20,000, it only took the company two weeks to completely run through the 1 million plus reservation list.

Now, anyone can head over to Tesla’s website and order a $79,990 Cybertruck and take delivery in as little as two weeks.

Overall, it’s interesting to see what kind of strategy Tesla will adopt as it attempts to attract new Cybertruck buyers. Let me know what the company should do going forward. Share your ideas by clicking the red “Add new comment” button below. Also, visit our site, torquenews.com/Tesla, regularly for the latest updates.

Image: Courtesy of Tesla, inc.

For more information, check out: I Don’t Know Why Women Keep Laughing at Me When I’m Out Driving my Tesla Cybertruck

Tinsae Aregay has been following Tesla and the evolution of the EV space daily for several years. He covers everything about Tesla, from the cars to Elon Musk, the energy business, and autonomy. Follow Tinsae on Twitter at @TinsaeAregay for daily Tesla news.

Submitted by Luc Nguyen (not verified) on October 29, 2024 - 11:52AM

Permalink

1. Reduce CyberTruck price to 60,000. range
2. Get back to the 1st promised in 2019 about 500 miles range/charge without the need of extra $16,000.00 for an extra battery that take up 1/3 of the truck bed (it's ridiculous to even called it the truck!!!)
3. Re-design Cyber Truck for more economy, more practical owner
With those, I might reconsider to buy one. Other than that, NO.

Submitted by Jerry (not verified) on October 29, 2024 - 1:22PM

Permalink

I have been a long time tesla owner. 2015 model S.
I'm all in on the Cybertruck, always wanting AWD model.
Now that it is here. And under $80k. I'm waiting for $7500 tax credit.
If Musk want to sell more trucks.
He needs to push this through quickly.
It will help justify the $8k FSD
I have test drove it a couple of times and totally sold.
My wife was hesitant till she drove it.

So you're waiting for Elon to bribe the political process so people looking to buy an $80,000 can get free FSD on the backs of taxpayers? GOP at its best. No Healthcare or Education funding but free autonomous driving if your in the market for an $80k truck. I'd ask how you sleep at night but something tells me you sleep just fine. Only in America....

Submitted by Fred (not verified) on October 29, 2024 - 7:33PM

Permalink

I'd consider one just as soon as everyone who initially put down a deposit (reservation fee?) is allowed to purchase one at the price that was mentioned when they did so. Within 10% of that price would also be acceptable (although it'd be the decent thing to do, if the company _lowered_ the price ten percent... for each three month period past the projected "ready" date that the people were given to expect the deliveries to start. But I understand that the company is in the control of someone who has gone so far as to "give to charity" money that really only benefited he and his - so that's probably not a realistic expectation.

I am, of course, not holding my breath. . . .

Submitted by Eric H (not verified) on October 30, 2024 - 9:52AM

Permalink

It's a hideous looking vehicle that doesn't deliver on its promises. Get it to its claimed pre launch 500 mile range and have it tick in at around 50k USD and you'll see a lot more demand. Even then I personally wouldn't want one since I don't like its design.

Submitted by George Whitehouse (not verified) on October 30, 2024 - 1:42PM

Permalink

I received the same email and others for the model 3. I have a 6 year old M3. Not looking to spend more $$ to upgrade.

For me if I bought a pickup again, I would probably go with an F150 or Chevy. I had to pick up 16 sheets of plywood for a home project, I just don't see the cybertruck, being that useful in comparison and price point is high.

Submitted by Sean (not verified) on October 30, 2024 - 6:00PM

Permalink

Should probably do more to point out that it starts at 82k. And what percent of people buy anything at starting price, right?The savings compared to gas is quite theoretical and typically something that an electric vehicle owner calculates after purchase price, not before it. I know that's how they wrote it. Just noticing even comments are missing that fact.....

Submitted by David Rosing (not verified) on November 18, 2024 - 5:44PM

Permalink

I think the problem with the vehicle is the name given to it by the Tesla marketing department. As a ‘truck’ it’s lacking, namely one can’t get a 4x8 sheet of plywood home with it, nor tow with anything that puts more than 100 pounds on the tow hitch without ripping the bumper off, nor be able to stand next to the ‘truck’ and reach over the side of the bed to get something in the bed.

But it does carry 5 people quite comfortably, get from 0 to 60 quickly, and have enough room for at least 5 sets of full golf bags, so I think it should have been named the “CyberTownCar.” So I’d think Tesla should push this onto livery and taxi services as it could do very well.

The only problem is, would any customer WANT to be seen getting out of one at an exclusive event?

Personally I don’t want one because the driver-machine interface is abysmal and one must take their eyes off the road to adjust HVAC, radio, or other controls. And I prefer the Silverado EV’s midgate option that can let me take some 4x8 sheets of plywood home with thge midgate option.

So, meh, no CyberTeslas for me.