According to Tesla’s Cybertruck Owner Manual, the Cybertruck “hitch assembly is designed to support vertical loads up to 160 lb (72 kg). Exceeding this maximum weight can cause damage.” Tesla further explains that the load is equivalent to two bicycles.
By now, we’ve all seen the storm that was set off when WhistlinDiesel showed the Cybertruck’s rear subframe snapped in half while attempting to pull a Ford F-150 stuck between two large concrete pipes.
Several weeks after that video's release, there is still debate whether the Cybertruck has a fatal flaw in its hitch strength or whether the all-electric truck performed correctly.
Initially, I was in the second camp; however, WhistlinDiesel came out with a second video showing the F-150 subjected to the same abuse did not experience the Cybertruck’s failure.
Unfortunately, keeping things blurry, Tesla has yet to address the issue. This means it’s up to us to collect available information to shed light on the subject matter.
And to our delight, Marc Thomas Sessa, on the Tesla Cybertruck Facebook group has spotted a line on Tesla’s official Cybertruck Owner’s Manual that suggests that the Cybertruck hitch might not be as sturdy as found in other trucks.
Marc writes…
“Want to see something funny? WhistlinDiesel might have been on to something here. This is directly from the Tesla website. Cybertruck can only support 160 lbs vertical load on the hitch before causing damage.
What’s interesting is that Cybertruck shares the same load limits as Model Y. Was Tesla just lazy and copied/pasted the same limits? Or is it really this low?
Most manufacturers don’t distinguish between vertical load and tongue weight limits. Usually, the tongue weight limit is 10% of the towing capacity. So an F-150 has about 700-1000lbs tongue weight limit.
160lbs is nothing on the hitch. Let’s demand Tesla either update their manual or update the hitch design so we can start doing truck things with our trucks.”
Below his post, Marc shared a screenshot from the official Cybertruck Onwer’s Manual. Under the Carrying Accessories category, it reads, “CAUTION: The hitch assembly is designed to support vertical loads up to 160 lb (72 kg). Exceeding this maximum weight can cause damage.”
Below, Tesla gives a further explanation, writing…
“The hitch receiver is designed to support vertical loads up to 160 lb (72 kg). When carrying bicycles, skis, or other items on the Cybertruck's hitch, always check to ensure that the maximum weight is not exceeded. When the carrier weighs 40 Ibs (18 kg), the weigh threshold is sufficient for carrying two bicycles weighing approximately 60 lb (27 kg) each, or four items weighing approximately 30 lbs (14 kg) each.”
As Marc pointed out in his post, the Cybertruck’s vertical load hitch rating is the exact same rating as that of Model Y’s hitch.
This is disappointing on the face of it; however, another Tesla Cybertruck forum user, David Griffin, shared information taken directly from Tesla, further complicating the issue.
David writes, “Probably a copy/paste error from Model Y. If you look in the Cybertruck towing section, it's clear that the vertical limit is 1,100lbs, not 160lbs.” David shares a screenshot from the Tesla Cybertruck Owners’ manual showing the tongue weight as 1100 lbs (499kg).
Tesla expands on the issue by writing…
“*The tongue weight is the downward force that the weight of the trailer exerts on the hitch. It must not exceed 10% of the maximum towing capacity. Carrying a significant amount of equipment, passengers, or cargo in the tow vehicle can reduce the tongue weight it can handle, which also reduces the maximum towing capacity.”
Here is where the confusion arises: if the tongue weight is the downward force a trailer exerts on the hitch, why are the tongue weight and vertical weight ratings different?
Many people in the comments seem to believe the Cybertruck’s 160-lb hitch rating is just a typo carried over from the Model Y manual.
Whereas others believe since the Model Y and the Cybertruck are the two Tesla vehicles with aluminum gigacastings, the 160 lbs rating might be something inherent to that design.
Please let me know what you think in the comments below. Share your opinion by clicking the red “Add new comment” button below. Also, visit our site, torquenews.com/Tesla, regularly for the latest updates.
Image: Screenshot from WhistlinDiesel’s YouTube video
For more information, check out: A Number of Tesla Customers Who No Longer Want to Take Delivery of Their Cybertruck Start a Petition to Get Their Non-Refundable $1000 Deposit Back
Tinsae Aregay has been following Tesla and the evolution of the EV space daily for several years. He covers everything about Tesla, from the cars to Elon Musk, the energy business, and autonomy. Follow Tinsae on Twitter at @TinsaeAregay for daily Tesla news.
Lol so I can't stand on this…
Lol so I can't stand on this thing 😭 as I weigh more then 160lbs go Tesla 😂😂😂
Some people are just…
Some people are just stronger and bigger than you. Time to put some muscle on little one.
Man, how small are you? 😂😂 I…
Man, how small are you? 😂😂
I'm 6'5 and I'd be a horror show at ~160lbs
Well it didn't just break…
Well it didn't just break from pulling he drove off the concrete pipes and the whole weight of the cybrtruck fell down on the hitch, of course it ducked it up lmao let's drop the other trucks with the full weight on their hitches lol
I towed a 9600lbs trailer…
I towed a 9600lbs trailer using my CT without any issues. I suspect that's a typo.
With the whistling diesel…
With the whistling diesel video the damage was done when he dropped the back of the CT down on to the concrete block from the round drain pipes so what to my eyrs happened is the weight of the truck coming down on to the hitch area created a lot of force upwards on the casting creating cracks that let go when WD pulled the f150 out of the mud.
The follow up video where he dropped the f150 , did it contact the concrete block in the same way? Or did it completely miss it as it rolled off the pipes?
Whats the shear load of that…
Whats the shear load of that secion of the frame/casting?
Most if not all the videos or comments I've seen talking about this issue hasn’t mentioned the shear load. This article has focused on the vertical or tongue load.
In the video of two trucks, the cybertruck made it across the concrete tubes and landed or rather dropped hard after clearing everything…which probably caused some damaged.
Make note the Ford bottomed out and never finished to have a similar impact, that is if it would've impacted at all.
Whats the shear load of that secion of the frame/casting?
Most if not all the videos or comments I've seen talking about this issue hasn’t mentioned the shear load. This article has focused on the vertical or tongue load.
In the video of two trucks, the cybertruck made it across the concrete tubes and landed or rather dropped hard after clearing everything…which probably caused some damaged.
Make note the Ford bottomed out and never finished to have a similar impact, that is if it would've impacted at all.
youtu.be/PK_EJ3DyiiA?t=352
That said, the CyberTruck was used to bail out the Ford after it bottomed out and in doing so, which is the point of this comment, it had to exert more force than the Ford could do on its on and when it came loose, the front wheels on the Ford jammed hard on the other concrete pipe and both vehicles came to a dead stop for a second hard and then bounced back and I think either at that point the shear load was exceeded
That said, the CyberTruck was used to bail out the Ford after it bottomed out and in doing so, which is the point of this comment, it had to exert more force than the Ford could do on its on and when it came loose, the front wheels on the Ford jammed hard on the other concrete pipe and both vehicles came to a dead stop for a second hard and then bounced back and I think either at that point the shear load was exceeded
You clearly are a Tesla…
You clearly are a Tesla fanboy because you never watched the follow-up video. They lifted the Ford all the way off the ground with an excavator and dropped it on the hitch repeatedly. Then they dropped a 2000 pound cement block on the hitch repeatedly and it still never broke.
Clearly you didn’t get that…
Clearly you didn’t get that it still wasn’t the same test. That ford bed was empty my guy. put 10,000 lbs of battery in the bed, and then drop it perfectly on just the hitch alone. Test it right or don’t test it.
You're an idiot! The Cyber…
The Cyber Tonka TOY completely failed! Those Giga castings crack and break like a brittle piece of candy. When cracks are found in the casting, they find it acceptable to patch certain cracks with the same material they use to dampen road noise inside the doors. Castings are dropped constantly, picked back up and moved down the line. Tesla's are actually pieces of shit!
The Cybertruck, and Tesla in…
The Cybertruck, and Tesla in general, is doing to electric vehicles what the Oldsmobile 350 Diesel did to diesel passenger cars in the 1980s. I am a big supporter of electric cars and trucks. But you should buy a good one. Rivian doesn't have any of these issues like the Cybertruck. As a bonus, the RIvian looks pretty good, as opposed to the Cybertruck, which looks like the illegitimate love child of Optimus Prime and an aluminum garden shed.
One thing I did not see…
One thing I did not see considered is that rear end took a pretty hard hit when he drove it off the flatbed. Quite possible that the frame was damaged then and finished off when he tried to tow the Ford. In fairness though the Ford was also driven straight off onto its bumper and did not suffer a frame failure with towing.
The ford has an aluminum…
The ford has an aluminum body on a steel frame. The cybertruck has a steel body on an aluminum frame. I don't think the aluminum frame can take the same kind of hits that a steel frame can. But let's be honest about this. In the real world no one is going to treat their truck like that. He set out to purposely destroy these trucks and he accomplished his goal on both trucks. There's other reasons that I would not be in the market to buy a cybertruck but the hitch thing would not be one of them.
The CyberTruck suffered two…
The CyberTruck suffered two downward impacts. One driving off the flatbed and the second driving off the concrete pipes. The Ford failed at both. What happened when he tried to drive the Ford after it drove off the flatbed? The crankshaft broke! Ford failed. Cost $900 to fix. Then the Ford got stuck on top of the pipes and could not complete the test. Ford failed again. He blamed Tesla for the delay in charging when they could not find the owner. Why could they not find the owner? He failed not Tesla. Again The Ford broke right at the start and could not drive. Ford lost. Tesla won.
I'll stick with my old truck…
I'll stick with my old truck and it's undisputed 500 lb tongue weight.
So adding enough weight like…
So adding enough weight like my fifth wheel and driving over a bump can essentially rip off my bumper causing me to loose thousands of dollars due to the cyber truck inadequacies and to only be able to hold up a weight of only two bicycles tells all of us that this is not a truck. It's a car Elon. If you see this you would have had a better chance calling this. The new El Camino they've been calling it the Cyber truck. You gave it a name that it can't live up to
160 pounds sticking a few…
160 pounds sticking a few feet out and up on a bike rack can easily put more torque on the hitch than 1100 pounds pushing straight down or 11,000 pounds pulling straight back. So both numbers could be correct. But still, even the flimsiest hitch around should be capable of supporting way more than the weight of the vehicle on it. Snagging trailer hitches on stuff is just a fact of life when driving on anything besides perfectly flat roads.
Dropping the rear end onto a…
Dropping the rear end onto a concrete had more to do with the ripping off than the towing loaf. So there's that.
You have a misspelled word…
You have a misspelled word in your first sentence. Please proofread your articles before posting.
I believe that this is a…
I believe that this is a matter of leverage. When you have a tow hitch and trailer attached, the tongue weight is straight down, whereas a cargo hitch (bicycle, cargo carrier, etc) actually stresses the hitch like a lever, twisting down, not pushing down. Think of it like a crowbar pulling apart two boards nailed together. The physics are different with leverage.
I'm not sure why, but the…
I'm not sure why, but the Cybertruck seems to attract the stupidest articles about it. Nobody does this with my F-150, even though it's a far worse vehicle. I think there are people who want a Cybertruck so bad, but don't really need a $100,000 truck, and just need to tear it down to make themselves feel better they don't have one.
There's a clear distinction…
There's a clear distinction between the yield strength of a cast part vs that of a ladder frame section made from high-strength steel. There's a significant knockdown factor comparing formed steel vs castings. And the Tesla castings aren't steel either. They are aluminum, which is even worse. You can slap on the fancy giga wording on their frames, but at the end of the day, it's still a die cast aluminum part, which is significantly weaker at the same thicknesses. I'm sure Tesla has increased the wall thicknesses to compensate a weaker casting to make it strong enough for towing capacities. But it's obvious that smacking a casting multiple times by dropping it off a flatbed and driving it off of some concrete tubes won't help it. It probably has sustained multiple shock loads and have started cracking before the knuckle heads decide to yank a F150 off, without giving a shit about the integrity of the cast frame. The kids here are trying as hard as possible to ruin these trucks to get the views. That's how they get paid by YouTube. If nothing breaks on either trucks, their videos would be boring. They HAVE to break something.
the cybertruck fell on the…
the cybertruck fell on the hitch hitting the concrete twice
he also hit it going over the logs
also he broke the hitch while in motion and the f150 suddenly got stuck and the amount of force happening there is pretty crazy
SUV, Supremely Useless…
SUV, Supremely Useless Vehicle, the Cybercrock is once again displaying why so many people consider this vehicle a complete waste of a lot of money 💵
So, instead of a bunch of bs…
Why not explain the difference between horizontal loads and vertical loads?
Steel bends, aluminum breaks…
Steel bends, aluminum breaks, and these idiots don't get to write this stuff off if they don't destroy something for their moronic viewers.
The Cybertruck is still a terrible product that shouldn't be on the road.