Add new comment

What an intentionally misleading and irresponsible attempt at an "article". The actual fact is, sample size. If you were a rational person with integrity, you would understand that modelsnfrom companies with millions of units produced per year and decades if not a century of experience will naturally have high sample size and low rates of incident. It isn't about the new brands being "broken in", which is the dumbest thing you could have made up, it's about them being literally new, having less volume to sample, and therefore even a few incidents will represent a higher percentage. You have a bias, obviously. If you don't have a bias, you have a critical thinking problem. Or is it both? But I guess the real question is, since this is such simple math, why do you people want to see U.S. innovators fail, and their Anerican employees to lose their jobs? After all, that is your goal by disparaging them with misinformation right? You have an ulterior motive, otherwise what isn't there to be proud of? Rivian and Lucid, for example, awarded best vehicles in the world. Rivian, ranked #1 customer satisfaction and loyalty. So, you have an integrity problem, and clearly are not an American automotive enthusiast.