A common myth related to vehicle reliability is that battery-electric vehicles are more reliable than conventional vehicles. The thought process behind this is that battery-electric vehicles have fewer moving parts, and thus, must be more reliable. The underlying thinking isn’t bad. However, it’s also not true.
Related Topic: Study Confirms Vehicles From EV Brands Most Unreliable, Hybrid Brands Very Reliable
Consumer Reports has followed up on its Least Reliable Brands listing, which found that many EV brands rank very low for reliability, with a detailed look at which specific models are the least reliable. On that list of ten total models, three are battery-electric vehicles, and they are from three different manufacturers. The least reliable models in America (According to owner-reported data compiled by Consumer Reports) include the Volkswagen ID.4, Rivian R1T, and the Ford F-150 Lightning. So, although there are relatively few battery-electric models on sale compared to the entire marketplace, they make up a meaningful portion of the worst in reliability listing.
Many who wish to discount Consumer Reports’ reliability reporting generally point to a few false narratives. These include:
- CR counts any little problem the same as a big problem. In fact, CR weighs the severity of problems when it comes to its reliability rankings. They are not dumb.
- The models listed are very new and, thus are just being broken in. In fact, the three electric-only models on this list are not at all new. The Rivian R1T has just entered its fifth calendar year of deliveries. The VW ID.4 is also in its fifth calendar year of deliveries and entered the market about six months before the R1T. The Ford F-150 Lightning entered the U.S. market in mid-2022.
- CR is somehow bribed by certain manufacturers to skew its rankings. This is the easiest of the false narratives to disprove. One of Consumer Reports’ major donors over the past decades has been the Ford Foundation. Ford is the brand with the most vehicles on the 2025 least reliable listing.
Another way to fact-check whether Consumer Reports’ rankings have validity is to look at its peers’ opinions of the various brands on this list. Check out the J.D. Power Dependability Study, and you will see that the lowest-ranked brands line up very closely with the lowest-ranked brands at Consumer Reports.
In addition to the three battery-electric vehicles on this new list of the least-reliable vehicles in America for 2025, there are two hybrid-electric vehicles listed. Both are from Ford, the brand with the most overall models on this list. The Escape HEV and F-150 HEV. Notably, zero of the least reliable models are from Toyota, Lexus, Hyundai, Kia, and Honda, the long-time leaders in hybrid-electric powertrains.
Battery-electric vehicles may someday prove to be more reliable than vehicles equipped with conventional powertrains. However, as of today, battery-electric vehicle models and brands continue to be ranked lowest in reliability.
If you'd like to add a comment under this story, please note that our comments section has returned and is in bold red at the bottom of the page.
John Goreham is a credentialed New England Motor Press Association member and expert vehicle tester. John completed an engineering program with a focus on electric vehicles, followed by two decades of work in high-tech, biopharma, and the automotive supply chain before becoming a news contributor. He is a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE int). In addition to his eleven years of work at Torque News, John has published thousands of articles and reviews at American news outlets. He is known for offering unfiltered opinions on vehicle topics. You can connect with John on Linkedin and follow his work on our X channel. Please note that stories carrying John's by-line are never AI-generated, but he does employ Grammarly grammar and punctuation software when proofreading.
Image of Rivian R1T by John Goreham.
Comments
Shocker! Another EV hit…
Permalink
Shocker! Another EV hit piece by the online rag torquenews. GTFO
You know which reliability…
Permalink
You know which reliability study doesn't line up with Consumer reports and JD Power? Whatcar. This is a British publication that has ranked Tesla highly for reliability for several years.
The difference? They only consider cost of service and time spent in service. This zeroes right in on what matters.
Consumer Reports ranks the…
Permalink
In reply to You know which reliability… by Apeweek (not verified)
Consumer Reports ranks the Model Y mid-pack and gives that model is recommended stamp.
While I'd mostly agree that…
Permalink
While I'd mostly agree that there's issues with electric vehicles, CR is notoriously dubious about their methods of testing and collecting data. What is true is that there are less things that can go wrong with EVs and their systems are more modular and simple. That doesn't factor in CRs "data" which is part of the issue with CR in general. Sorry man, but I chalk this up to more anti-EV misinformation than actual news.
Torque news is like Fox News…
Permalink
Torque news is like Fox News for cars.
You mean more like CNN,…
Permalink
In reply to Torque news is like Fox News… by Jon (not verified)
You mean more like CNN, MSNBC.
I have never placed ANY high…
Permalink
I have never placed ANY high regard on anything Consumer Reports nor J D Powers posts as an authority. Grossly biased and easily swayed. Terrible metrics used to review.
Interesting comment, Tag. If…
Permalink
In reply to I have never placed ANY high… by Tag Gehman (not verified)
Interesting comment, Tag. If you were in a position to report on vehicle quality and durability in the U.S. market, what metrics would you employ, and what sources would you use?
What an intentionally…
Permalink
What an intentionally misleading and irresponsible attempt at an "article". The actual fact is, sample size. If you were a rational person with integrity, you would understand that modelsnfrom companies with millions of units produced per year and decades if not a century of experience will naturally have high sample size and low rates of incident. It isn't about the new brands being "broken in", which is the dumbest thing you could have made up, it's about them being literally new, having less volume to sample, and therefore even a few incidents will represent a higher percentage. You have a bias, obviously. If you don't have a bias, you have a critical thinking problem. Or is it both? But I guess the real question is, since this is such simple math, why do you people want to see U.S. innovators fail, and their Anerican employees to lose their jobs? After all, that is your goal by disparaging them with misinformation right? You have an ulterior motive, otherwise what isn't there to be proud of? Rivian and Lucid, for example, awarded best vehicles in the world. Rivian, ranked #1 customer satisfaction and loyalty. So, you have an integrity problem, and clearly are not an American automotive enthusiast.
EM, you do make a very…
Permalink
In reply to What an intentionally… by EM (not verified)
EM, you do make a very important point here. With EVs being such a teeny tiny portion of the overall market, it's hard to gauge their reliability. Thank you for making the point here in the comments.