Skip to main content

I Regret Buying This Subaru Outback

I purchased a 2014 Subaru Outback and would not buy this same trim level again. Here's my story about buying the wrong vehicle and having buyer's remorse. 

Don't make this mistake.

Looking back at my purchase of a 2014 Subaru Outback, I've come to the realization that I should have chosen a different trim level. Let me share my story of making the wrong choice and the regret that followed.

The Subaru Outback is an excellent vehicle, so I purchased a low-mileage 2014 Outback midsize SUV. It's got everything I wanted in a 10-year-old model. At least that's what I thought when I bought it. 

This 2014 Outback Limited had 103,000 miles on the odometer, and it was clean. At first, I loved the new all-wheel-drive wagon. It came with the optional 3.6-liter Boxer engine and had plenty of power for mountain driving.

  • It has 8.7 inches of ground clearance, so it's easy to get in and out of. 
  • It has an excellent safety score from the IIHS. It earned the highest Top Safety Pick+ award
  • Its standard Symmetrical all-wheel-drive technology is perfect for the Colorado winters, severe weather, and snowfall where I live. 
  • It has plenty of cargo-carrying ability with both seats folded flat. It holds much more than I expected. 
  • It came with standard roof rails, so I could carry more oversized cargo on the vehicle's top if needed. 
  • The Outback rides like a car, it's easy to live with, and it has the utility and versatility of an SUV. 

It sounds perfect, right? Ok, so what's wrong with the Outback?

It’s not THE Subaru Outback that’s the problem. It's This Outback 3.6R trim level that did not come with Subaru's EyeSight driver assist safety technology. My other vehicle, a Subaru Crosstrek, does have it, and I love it.

My wife and I took our "new" Outback on a road trip to Cypress, Texas, outside Houston, to visit our daughter and family. It's about 1,100 miles one way.  

The first part of the trip was uneventful, and the car rode well on the open highway. I set the cruise control, and we had an enjoyable time driving. 

Then I realized I did not have the adaptive cruise control my Crosstrek has with the EyeSight driver assist technology. Read my report here for more information.

That tech allows me to set the cruise control, and it will automatically slow the vehicle when I approach another slower car or semi-truck. When I get into the left lane to pass, the vehicle speeds back up to its original setting. 

This feature, known as adaptive cruise control, is part of Subaru's EyeSight technology, which also includes lane departure warning, pre-collision braking, and more.

I've driven the same route in my Crosstrek with EyeSight and barely touched the brake or gas pedals for the 1,100-mile trip. The adaptive cruise did all the work. 

Here's what I noticed. 

I was much more fatigued after getting to Cypress in the Outback without EyeSight than in my Crosstrek after the long trip. The Subaru EyeSight technology is worth every penny. 

I'm disappointed that I didn't get the Outback with EyeSight. 

One of my biggest disappointments with the Outback was the absence of the EyeSight technology. I found myself wishing I had made a different choice.

Another aspect that disappointed me was the fuel mileage. The best I could get was 25 mpg on the highway, and I averaged 22 mpg in city driving with the Outback's six-cylinder Boxer engine. Not bad for the larger 3.6-liter Boxer, but I want better fuel efficiency. 

I know what you're thinking.

Since you know Subaru vehicles so well, why did you buy this Outback and not look for a 2.5-liter with Eyesight? Great question. I knew the lady who owned this Outback and how it was driven, maintained, and serviced. And the price was right.

Ten-year-old, well-maintained low mileage Subaru Outback SUVs are not that easy to find. That's why I jumped on this one. 

Still, if given the chance, I would make a different choice and opt for the 2014 Subaru Outback with the 2.5-liter four-cylinder Boxer engine and the EyeSight safety tech feature. Hindsight is always 20-20. 

Tell us about your Outback experiences. Any regrets?

If you've had a similar experience with a Subaru vehicle, or if you have any questions or comments, we'd love to hear from you. Click the red 'Add new comment' link below to share your thoughts and join the conversation.

I am Denis Flierl, a top Torque News reporter since 2012. I’ve invested over 13 years in the automotive industry in a consulting role, working with every major car brand. I am an experienced Rocky Mountain Automotive Press member. You'll find my expert Subaru analysis here. Follow me on my X SubaruReportAll Subaru, WRXSTI, @DenisFlierlFacebook, and Instagram.

Photo credit: Denis Flierl 

Comments

David Kucher (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 6:58AM

He should watch and listen to Scotty Kilmer take heed to his advice and stay away from Subaru 6 cylinders. The 4 cylinders are more reliable and serve just as good a purpose. Much better fuel economy as well.

warreni (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 7:13AM

I've been driving Subarus for the last 10 years and every time I drive a family member's car or a rental (unless it's a Toyota), the adaptive cruise control is the thing I miss the most. Once you get used to it, driving without it becomes a chore.

Jason Ward (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 7:51AM

This my friend is called sociology and why I stopped doing Subaru when they got out of the WRC.

If you want to drive long distances, it shouldn't be easy. That's how our brains work...

Czarofsewage (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 8:51AM

Quit being a whiner! If you bought an outback with thev2.5 your mileage would be better and you would complain about lack of power. If you had the eyesight your windshield would crack and you would complain about the $1200 replacement cost.
There is always something to complain about. Man up, pay attention and drive. Or let your wife or girlfriend drive like the rest of the negative complainers. Glad you are not traversing the Terra firma in a connestoga wagon with a 4 horse team you have to tend to every 20 miles or so!

Essfolkman (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 9:24AM

I had to comment, just to say that your observations about what you 'missed' specification and 'features wise' ... are almost polar opposite to mine. I would hate with a passion the nannying 'car driving me' features 90% of the time. Subaru's direction (especially here in the UK for more than a decade) has been spineless, cynical and depressing. The new breed of CVT everything blamannge = so opposite to their 90s and 00s era of building great drivers cars that were engaging drivers cars, not overly complicated and with superb (yet basic) character. I feel that Impreza WRX model aside, Subaru has steadily thrown away or consciously side stepped the CORE of why folk purchased their vehicles. To me most of the modern monstrosity available are catering for coffin dodgers that wouldn't know how to drive fast, make the chassis 'dance' or have any elements of fun dynamically. The upper interior windscreens are stuffed with gizmos that IMVHO have absolutely no place in a Subaru. I used to sell Volvos in the mid 90s (then Subarus late 90s and early 00s) ... and what a suberb era that was for both brands, especially for those enthusiast driver types. Now I cannot equate either brands to thier former selfs. They have sold out and diversified so entirely from what they once did so well, both courting very different customer types, ones that I cannot connect with :(*

Matt (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 10:33AM

Really? I don't like the adaptive cruise. I hate being lulled to sleep behind some truck at 65 mph. Only then to pull out to pass, and the cruise co tr mashes the throttle (reducing your mpg). Especially on a long trip, letting the nanny manage the throttle can have a big impact. Secondly, I hate how eyesight is constantly telling you to stay in your lane, keep your eyes on the road, take a break, take a dump, say nice things to your wife. It’s too much.

Kurt Churba (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 1:37PM

I too have a ‘14 Subaru Outback Limited but mine has the 2.5L and Eyesight. We purchased the vehicle 3.5 years ago with 52k on the odo. Our Subie has adequate power and averages at best 25 MPG here in Idaho (80 MPH).
I AM NOT a fan of the Eyesight system and find it annoying. If you’re headed into the sun, the system will turn off due to sun “blindness.” It’s hard to deactivate and cruise won’t work if Eyesight is off. The lane departure alarm is a nuisance. When I drive in SLC, Utah (heavy traffic), Eyesight is continually beeping at me and slowing me down due to cars moving in and out of my lane of travel. I would much prefer a “standard” cruise control.
I’m old school (and 60+ years old) when it comes to my vehicles- let me drive and it’s up to me to pay attention.
All that said- I’m happy with our purchase, the AWD works great and it’s been a reliable vehicle.

jimmy (not verified)    August 1, 2024 - 5:29PM

thays a shame , In Australia this trim comes with Eyesight , adaptive cruise etc . I used to get around 30mpg ( we use L/100km ) highway . city was indeed 22 or worse)

BARRY KUNSMAN (not verified)    August 2, 2024 - 6:59AM

I am NOT that big a fan of my 2022 Outback or dealer. Let me explain. Bought a 2018 Outback for my wife. (we still own)Since it was her car only drove a few times. I Got to drive it on a long trip and loved it. Retiring soon I purchased my 22 as a gift to me. Purchased/ordered during pandemic and had to wait 4 months for it. Could not get a good price. Also they were going to charge a higher interest rate had i not found a better one. From start radio/text option not correct. Still not after 2 years. Radio is to stay on after car shuts off till you open door. Sometimes it does/doesn't. Newest problem I'm waiting on is the sun "melted" door molding. Plus a battery warranty they will not honor. Other than that all is ok.

Ryan Hoffman (not verified)    August 3, 2024 - 2:55PM

I purchased a 2010 Outback 3.6R Limited with 55,000 miles on it 5 years ago. I don't drive far in my day to day life and wanted a snow worthy SUV that could haul or tow if I wanted to. It has fit my life perfectly, as I maintain it inside and out meticulously. It still only has 74,000 miles on it and runs like a top.

Teri R (not verified)    August 3, 2024 - 5:06PM

My last Outback was a 2014 with eyesight, adaptive cruise, and the 3.6L engine. Best car in the world. Would never buy the downsize engine. Had 159k on it and zero problems when some child ran a stop and it was totaled. Took a while to find another 3.6R Outback with all the bells and whistles. I bought a 2019, the last year of the big 3.6R engine. The boxer engine makes it zippy like a Porsche and pulls like a truck. You somehow found a very rare scaled down 3.6R. Sorry. But they are the dream with all the fixings.

Steve Hinkley (not verified)    August 3, 2024 - 11:43PM

I regret buying this Subaru Outback is
a very misleading title to your article.
You make it sound like is something wrong with the car so people click on it. The title should be, I wish I would of purchased an Outback with the same technology as my Crosstrek.

Mike D (not verified)    August 4, 2024 - 12:23PM

I have the eye-sight on my 2021 Crosstrek and I hate it. Leave it disabled all the time. Wish I could give it to you honestly.

Zeev a (not verified)    August 5, 2024 - 6:35AM

The subaru's eyesight system was introduced only in 2019 and not before . So your car , 2014 outback could not have that system. You should be trust on yourself and drive carefully and be happy with this car . It's really a jam .

Xccv (not verified)    August 5, 2024 - 8:20AM

So all the dis comes for lacking Eyesight that was introduced on a later model?
To me it sounds petty.
You haven't talk about any other experience or offroad driving...
Useless article...

Dannyboy (not verified)    August 5, 2024 - 10:57AM

When purchasing a car, always buy a model with latest driver technology on it, or you will likely regret it. I have 1 older car and 1 new car. The older car doesn’t even have a backup camera. It seems so outdated and unpleasant when backing up.

Linda Rose (not verified)    August 5, 2024 - 4:00PM

I have a 2022 Outback Limited with eyesight and the smaller engine. I love it. However it is the last one I will have. The windshields on the 2022 Outback and Crosstrek are garbage. They can crack for no reason. The complaints are staggering. They had the same problem with the 2018 Ascent. They won’t stand behind them. So you can spend a fortune replacing them. I had mine replaced and the next week it was cracked again. I can’t afford to keep replacing them. Subaru builds a great car. Not smart to own up to their problem with windshields. Replace them with a proper windshield and keep customer loyalty. It really is a shame. So many people have said they would never own another one because of it. Me too.

Dwight (not verified)    August 6, 2024 - 9:06AM

I purchased a 2013 Subaru outback with the 2.4L engine and after I purchased it, I did some more research on it and my car had every single do not buy warning on it
high oil consumption And issues with the transmission. My car had 100,000 miles on it but the good news was that Subaru replace my engine small block engine they did replace my transmission. I did finally end up getting rid of the car at 236,000 miles and I brought myself a 2022 Subaru Forester, I did keep my outback for five years

Steve Anderson (not verified)    August 6, 2024 - 10:32AM

If you need all that driving assistance, maybe you should let the wife drive. I would rather be in charge of my own destiny. All that "safety" crap is why a lot of people have to mortgage their home to buy a decent car. It only encourages drivers to be less attentive. I own a Subaru Forester with eyesight. I love the car except for the eyesight. I' m going to disable the auto start/ stop. I wish the eyesight was as easy to circumvent.

J. Jones (not verified)    August 6, 2024 - 3:34PM

What a Baby!!!....How about driving a car with NO cruise control, NO air conditioning and manual roll up windows!
Way to much GARBAGE on vehicles today and to much BIG GOVERNMENT listening through these newer cars!
Buy old gas guzzlers!!

Greg M (not verified)    August 7, 2024 - 1:21AM

All the bells and whistles this guy is complaining about missing were standard on the 2015 Outback Limited. He should have bought a 15 instead of a 14 model.And when you buy a used car, you can't expect all options installed unless you are the original buyer.

Lawrence T Gurley (not verified)    August 7, 2024 - 9:09AM

I have a 2021 Outback Touring XT that I bought new. It has had a variety of small niggling problems that have been mostly just aggravating and fixed under warranty including water leak, tires worn out at 19,000 miles due to alignment problems, some fouled-up programming and AC coolant leakage. Now out of warranty the AC has been blowing warm and they say it needs new compressor for $2000.00! I'm so disenchanted with Subaru I'm thinking I need to go buy another Honda. I've had very good luck with them.

Harry Ledbetter (not verified)    August 7, 2024 - 12:16PM

I to have a small remorse! I bought a 2024 Subaru Outback Limited XT from. Dealer in Kuwait. We were both really clear I need automatic folding windows to get in my antic car porch, and I was assured this was the model.
I believe my price was well below MSRP, but I have to get out of the Subaru when I pull up to the house or leave the house and slick back both mirrors.

Next time I’ll at least trim up to touring 🤬

John Holderfield (not verified)    August 7, 2024 - 4:39PM

Have a 2012 Outback 256,000 miles on Her. I would say half of that mileage was pulling a 13 ft. Scamp Travel Trailer!! Has never broke down on Me only real ig thing I had done was the valve box in the transmission rebuilt. I have a 2.5 motor....the best!!

Sparky (not verified)    August 7, 2024 - 8:29PM

The 2015 model is a leap forward from the previous.
The interior feel & quality
The improved handling
I had one for 4 years and found it a great car for city anf mountain driving.

Art Campbell (not verified)    August 8, 2024 - 11:31AM

I purchased a low mileage beautiful Subaru Outback Premium in 2021, with the 2.5 engine. There was no Eyesight technology on this vehicle, but I bought it for it's solid reputation. That turned out to be an expensive mistake! You see, I didn't do my research on this vehicle. . .I just relied on it's reputation. It turns out, the 2013 and 2014 Subaru 2.5 had a problem with oil consumption, and fouling the spark plugs! But Subaru didn't have recall on this engine. They were sued and as a result, they replaced some engines. But that left a whole bunch of those Subaru vehicles on used car lots with damaged engines. I just happened to buy one of those. I managed to get 400 to 500 miles to a quart of oil. So, to compound my judgement in purchasing this vehicle, I opted to replace the engine with a so called "low mileage" engine in 2023 for $2,500, installation included. Well, you can imagine what happened here. . .this engine developed the same problem!!
I just recently traded it in on a 2024 Outback, and yes, it came with the Eyesight technolgy.