A Need for Side Impact Protection Improvement
According to a recent Consumer Reports newsletter, last year the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found that there was a need for side impact protection improvement in SUVs.
Of 20 small SUVs tested in a new side crash test, only one---the Mazda CX-5---got a top Good rating, whereas two models (Honda HR-V and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross) on the other side of the scale, earned the lowest score of Poor.
Related article: Consumer Reports Most Reliable 3-Year-Old Midsized SUVs With Modern Safety Features
The new side crash test consisted of a simulated increased striking vehicle mass and speed increase from 3,300 to 4,200 pounds and from 31 mph to 37 mph respectively that results in 82 percent more energy than the former side crash test.
The reason for the new test was to determine how vehicles would fare if they were struck from the side by a heavier, midsized SUV or truck at a higher speed.
Related article: Consumer Reports New Car Winners and Losers for This Important Safety Feature
Here’s a video that shows the new test in action on small SUVs:
Small SUVs struggle in new side test - IIHS News
Testing Midsized SUV Results
When the same type of testing shown in the video was performed on midsized SUVs, what crash safety analysts found was that automakers have responded to last year’s poor findings by making significant design improvements to make their vehicles more impervious to the higher side crash standard.
Related article: The Gory Truth About Seat Belts from Consumer Reports and a Paramedic
According to CR analysts, two crash test dummies designed to simulate a small woman and a 12-year-old child, were placed in the driver’s seat and the rear seat (directly behind the driver) respectively.
Under the IIHS rating categorization of Good, Acceptable, Marginal, and Poor with the new crash test, here are the results of the testing ranked by performance:
Good rating
• Ford Explorer
• Infiniti QX60
• Lincoln Aviator
• Mazda CX-9
• Nissan Pathfinder
• Subaru Ascent
• Toyota Highlander
• Volkswagen Atlas
• Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport
• Volkswagen ID.4
Acceptable rating
• Buick Enclave
• Chevrolet Traverse
Marginal rating
• Honda Passport
• Honda Pilot
• Hyundai Palisade
• Jeep Wrangler 4-door
• Kia Telluride
• Nissan Murano
Poor Rating: None among the vehicles tested
IIHS’s senior research engineer Becky Mueller stated for Consumer Reports, “It’s encouraging to see so many midsized SUVs from different automakers earn Good ratings in this more challenging evaluation…These results will help confirm the adjustments they need to make to other vehicles going forward.”
And finally…
For additional articles related to vehicle safety, here are a few for your consideration:
• Consumer Reports Best SUVs Under $35,000 That Come Standard with Active Safety Systems
• Ford Rear Occupant Alert Video Highlights Summer Dangers for Children and Pets
• Consumer Reports Discusses When Your Car’s Lawsuit Avoidance Safety Feature Fails
COMING UP NEXT: Recommended Compact Hybrid Cars Per New Consumer Reports Survey
Timothy Boyer is a Torque News automotive reporter based in Cincinnati. Experienced with early car restorations, he regularly restores older vehicles with engine modifications for improved performance. Follow Tim on Twitter at @TimBoyerWrites for daily new and used vehicle news.
Image Source: Pixabay