Skip to main content

This 2024 Chevy Silverado's Best Handling Was To Replace It. It's Better To Lose $10K Than Losing Truck Sales

GM replacing this man's Silverado may be the best answer to his situation, which may have already been resolved by now. Yet, we live in a digital age where online reputation is so important for a carmaker or a dealership.

A few days ago, I published a story detailing one Silverado owner's experience with a brand-new 2024 Chevy Silverado that, within just 594 miles of ownership, required major repairs—specifically, replacing two cylinders. It sparked significant discussion about whether GM and its dealers are handling such situations appropriately, particularly in a world where online reputation plays a critical role in shaping consumer trust. One comment, in particular, from a reader named CCB, stood out for its detailed critique and thought-provoking insights.

Here’s what CCB had to say:

"The right thing to do was to take this Silverado back. 594 miles? Then address the issue with GM. A Jeep dealer owner offered to ship a new Grand Cherokee to Colorado to replace a unit with a trans shifter issue. Dealers have the ability to make decisions."

"Worst case… the Silverado could have been replaced. The new/old unit could have been repaired and sold again as used with full warranty. If there was a loss on the sale of the new/old vehicle, the dealer could have had GM step up for the difference."

"The dealer doesn’t understand the damage to its reputation from not handling this right. Social media is killer in today’s online-centric world. 18-45 [year-olds] don’t do anything without reaching for their phone. This isn’t your father’s Oldsmobile day anymore. The public has a voice with unlimited audience."

"The math: Let’s say they lost 10k on the resale. How many sales did they lose at 5k per truck because their online reputation is so bad customers don’t even show up to buy? This is a lesson for the NADA and should be circulated."

Why Carmaker's Reputation Should Trump Short-Term Losses

CCB’s comment hits at the heart of a growing issue in the automotive world: customer service and accountability in the digital age. Here’s the situation: with less than 600 miles on the odometer, this Silverado had a critical mechanical failure. That’s not a minor hiccup—it’s a failure that undermines confidence in the product, especially for a vehicle marketed for reliability and ruggedness. The idea that GM—or its dealership network—should step up and replace such a vehicle is not just logical; it’s good business.

CCB correctly highlights how damaging this situation is for the dealership’s reputation. A dissatisfied customer like me has a platform to share experiences, and when those stories resonate with the public, the ripple effect can be profound. In today’s digital-first world, potential buyers often research dealers online, reading reviews and forums before ever setting foot in a showroom. A string of bad reviews or unresolved customer complaints can deter dozens—or even hundreds—of potential sales.

Let’s break down the scenario from a cost perspective, as CCB did. If the dealer takes a $10,000 hit on the resale of the repaired Silverado but preserves its reputation, that’s a calculated loss. However, if the mishandling of such cases leads to five potential customers walking away, each representing a $5,000 profit margin on a truck sale, the total loss balloons to $25,000. Reputation, as CCB points out, has a tangible dollar value in this context.

What GM and Dealers Need to Learn From This

The automotive industry is no stranger to public scrutiny. When customers pay a premium for a new vehicle, they expect quality—and if something goes wrong, they expect it to be made right without a fight. Dealers are the face of the brand in the customer’s eyes, and the ability to make decisions that prioritize customer satisfaction is crucial. GM and its dealer network must recognize that when major failures occur early in ownership, the situation often calls for a replacement rather than a repair. This sends a powerful message: “We stand behind our product.”

Moreover, there’s precedent for this kind of response. As CCB mentions, a Jeep dealer replaced a Grand Cherokee for a customer facing a transmission shifter issue. That act of goodwill likely turned a dissatisfied customer into a brand ambassador, someone who will now share their positive experience. It’s a lesson in understanding the lifetime value of a customer, which extends far beyond a single transaction.

This Isn’t Your Father’s Oldsmobile Era

As CCB aptly states, today’s customers have a voice amplified by social media, and they use it to hold companies accountable. This shift means that businesses—automotive or otherwise—must adapt to prioritize reputation and trust over short-term profit margins. The days when customers silently endured poor service are long gone.

GM’s handling of this Silverado case could set a precedent. Will they take a proactive approach to ensure customer satisfaction and protect their reputation, or will they risk losing potential customers in a hyper-competitive market? The decision should be clear: in 2024, reputation isn’t just part of the business—it is the business.

Do you think GM should have replaced the Silverado outright? Have you experienced similar challenges with new vehicles? Share your thoughts in the comments below. I’d love to hear how you think dealerships can improve their approach to customer service in situations like this.

What do you think? Should GM and its dealerships adopt a policy of replacing new vehicles with major early-life failures? Have you faced similar issues with a dealership, and if so, how was it resolved? Let’s discuss—share your stories and opinions in the comments below.

In the mean time, the 2025 Chevrolet Silverados are one their way to dealers now

Armen Hareyan is the founder and the Editor in Chief of Torque News. He founded TorqueNews.com in 2010, which since then has been publishing expert news and analysis about the automotive industry. He can be reached at Torque News TwitterFacebookLinkedin, and Youtube. He has more than a decade of expertise in the automotive industry with a special interest in Tesla and electric vehicles.

Comments

Jon v (not verified)    November 28, 2024 - 8:40PM

my motor locked up going down interstate. It took 2 weeks get into the shop to diagnose the issue. My Silverado only had 10,161. My motor 6.2L

Ryan Phillips (not verified)    November 29, 2024 - 10:40AM

In reply to by Jon v (not verified)

GM has the record for reliable V8 engines, but the cylinder deactivation is killing the reliability it seems with cam lifter failure. However, that 6.2L engine is a beast in a 1500 truck. I had the equivalent in my 16 Camaro with no cylinder deactivation and with new cams and performance parts still super reliable and great gas mileage for 500+ hp.

Eliot Steele (not verified)    December 1, 2024 - 9:56PM

In reply to by john (not verified)

Yes, and that makes the dealer's response worse. A 4 cylinder in a truck is a hard sell for many buyers, whatever its actual performance might be. Stories like this will only exacerbate the the image problem. Two cylinders is half the engine.

McCall (not verified)    November 29, 2024 - 7:30AM

I bought a 2023 Chevy Silverado Custom in November 11, 2022, from Miami Lakes Auto Mall in Miami, FL. However, I live in North Florida and about 7 months of ownership coming home from long working road trip on I95 North, I moved to the left lane to pass a car on the right. When I hit the gas, I lost all power and my truck shook violently, then all sudden my truck burst forward. I got off the gas and the truck settle down. Then I got back down to my cruise speed of 75 mph. Then I punch it again and the same thing happened again. So I took my truck into Gordan Chevrolet in Jacksonville, FL and Service Advisor there set me immediately up with a rental car while they service my truck under warranty. About a week later they called me and said my truck was ready. I pick up my truck and a week later it happened again. So, I called the Service Advisor back and told him that the issue was not resolved, so I bought the truck back and once again they give great customer service and set me up with another rental car. This time kept my truck longer and the technician had to contact GM engineer who built the engine to help fix the issue. It was an issue that GM or the engineer ever faced before and what explained to me was; the engine was getting enough fuel when you suddenly step on the gas for passing power. Nevertheless, the Gordon Chevrolet technician and GM engineer was able to figure it out and I haven't any issue since. So I must give Gordon Chevrolet Dealership and Service Department for awesome and great customer service. Even though I brought the truck from a dealership over 400 miles away, Gordon Chevrolet stepped up to the plate and handled the situation correctly.

Cardi DeMonaco (not verified)    November 29, 2024 - 8:34AM

I have a twenty four silverado LT. Leased a demo with 2,059 miles on it. The brakes make noise first thing in the morning, it goes away after that sometimes. Once in a while, I can hear it at work when I leave work. Dealership tells the brakes are breaking in.
The truck has fifty three hundred miles on it. Service guy at the dealership told me g m said that was normal.
I don't see anything normal in that.

Rich Junker (not verified)    December 1, 2024 - 11:40AM

In reply to by Cardi DeMonaco (not verified)

Don't you just love when they tell us some BS story that we know isn't true. I can't tell you how many times i have read on different forms from customers that get the (That's Normal)BS story from a dealership.

Ryan Phillips (not verified)    November 29, 2024 - 10:36AM

Entitlement is the problem now a days. What makes you think that you should go online and cry about an issue when it is detailed in the beginning of buying a vehicle? It is standard practice and you except the terms of the contract. There is a warranty issue they will fix it and give you a rental car in the mean time. So you and the original poster think they should give you a brand new truck after you already accepted the terms? Things happen in life and just because your a princess does not mean any one else will acknowledge or care. Even the best made products have a failure rate. It sucks if you get the shirt end. That is life and you make the best of it. Get it fixed and move. How you act in the mean time is what defines the person you are.

Tommy (not verified)    December 3, 2024 - 8:35PM

In reply to by Ryan Phillips (not verified)

This thing is, we aren't talking about 10k miles, we aren't even to 1k yet. My ex bought a 2014 Grand Cherokee Overland brand new. Within 200 miles the transmission locked up and wouldn't shift out of park. Luckily it was in the driveway when it happened. They had to drag the truck onto a flatbed. I called and spoke to the dealer asking for a new truck as who wants a "brand new" truck that has already had transmission work at 200 miles. They did the right thing and replaced the truck. That is how it's done if you are a good dealer. This will be a rebuilt motor in a 500 mile truck. Is that right? The owner didn't abuse the truck. He just got a lemon. It shouldn't be his problem. If he had to trade/sell it next year, he would get penalized dearly by the dealer for that black mark.

Chip (not verified)    December 3, 2024 - 8:59PM

In reply to by Ryan Phillips (not verified)

I have to agree. I had a lemon 1998 Chevy truck with a 4.3 engine. I didn’t want a new truck-I wanted mine fixed to be safe.
My issue was that the OBD computer was bad. One dealer and I proved this by disconnecting parts that should have set off the check engine light but didn’t.
It was the finally dealer who tried to repair it who suggested the lemon law. I asked GM why they wouldn’t just replace the computer, as did the dealer. GM told the dealer to “let the customer go through the lemon law.”
This after GM put tons of money into the truck including a new transmission, several windshields that delaminated, even a wiper motor.
All I wanted was my truck to fall under our agreement. But no, they opted instead for me to send the 60 individual pages of repair work to the attorney general.
They then gave me $2500 back in lease payments and about lost a customer.
I agree-let them fix it

Dean Diller (not verified)    November 29, 2024 - 5:56PM

The manufacturer is betting that you will not pursue replacement for a defective new vehicle. I purchased a brand new Buick several years ago.In fact I purchased a new GMC 2500 Denali at the same time from an excellent dealership in Pennsylvania which is near my summer residence. When I got back to Florida my wife said the check engine light was on. Took it to the Buick/GMC dealership here in Fl. They said that it was a transmission issue and that they fixed it. Several days later the check engine light comes on again. Return it to dealership. they had GM Involved and replaced some part. Several days later, light comes on again. So I contact GM customer service and they tell me to try another dealership. So I take to a dealership over in Orlando. When I pick the vehicle I drive it home and when I pull into my driveway the check engine light comes on. I call GM customer service and insist on a replacement. They want to send the regional SERVICE manager. I said we are past the repairing process after 3 attempts my wife is scared to drive the car so it is useless. I demanded to speak with someone in corporate. The person I spoke to in corporation also insisted that they would only try to repair the transmission. I said I want credit for what I paid for this vehicle and wanted to trade it in on another Buick just like this one because it was a lemon. They denied replacement even though I told them I am a loyal GM customer. I said that I have had a GM product in my driveway since I was 16 years old and I am 65,
plus I currently own over $250,000 of GM products ( fun vehicle is a new zo6 Corvette). They could care less! I contacted a lemon law attorney in Philadelphia that specializes in lemon law. He got all my money back from GM plus they had to pay the attorney fees. The manufacturers are gambling that you don't pursue the lemon laws. Unfortunately that is the consumers only option sometimes.

George (not verified)    November 29, 2024 - 6:43PM

Well...if there is a defect in the production line the dealer in my opinion must respond immediately in order to resolve the issue must find a way to help the costumer because loosing him & following by other having the same problem with the truck it's not good practice of making money ( practice) !

Donald Barnes (not verified)    December 1, 2024 - 1:30PM

I think chevy should replace the truck with a new one I my self own a 2009 silverado which has problems with losing oil out of the tail pipe the issue is with bad piston rings that GM never fix when it was brought up from Consumers. Is still is a issue.oil has to be Check all the time.to make sure it doesn't run low on oil.

Art (not verified)    December 1, 2024 - 10:57PM

As a gm buyer for over 40 years I purchased a 2017 gmc 1500 sierra. After a few weeks I noticed a transmission shift problem. The dealer tried to go the route of we are told to do this and that. Pissing me off to the point i did my maintenance services myself. Not only my gmc but my wife’s. They gave me the runaround and now lost my business and future purchases for gm. I loved my truck except the transmission and screen issues. My eyes are now looking at FORD. Goodbye gm.

Jones (not verified)    December 2, 2024 - 10:00AM

On that note,dealers also purchase their vehicles from the manufacturer, so you would figure if their vehicles are arriving to them second rate and damaging the dealerships reputation they would be all over the manufacturer to rectify the problem, and from my perspective, pick up trucks (although very useful) are the most over priced vehicles on the market. Who wants to stuff gravel 8n an 80 thousand dollar truck,sure you can purchase a truck for those chores but will you get the options you want. Even a special order is going to cost you when upgrading.

Bob (not verified)    December 2, 2024 - 12:34PM

I’d be outraged! Wanna bet how many sales of new trucks this story has cost the dealership? A lot more than they would have lost by replacing the broken truck or installing a new factory engine.
I’m amazed by the lack of business sense and loyalty to their customers. This should have never happened.
I wonder if the customer ever spoke with a GM zone manager? In the past that has ALWAYS been more successful than fighting with the dealership for me. Most Zone managers have a much wider perspective than individual dealerships.

Deacon (not verified)    December 2, 2024 - 6:23PM

I have a 2024 Silverado ZR2 that the motor went out on with 2300 miles on it. GM is covering the replacement motor under warranty of course but in the meantime I don't have a truck. The dealership offered me a Cruze as a loaner. GM offered me 14 days of a rental at a max rate of $44 a day. Meanwhile my truck is not just transportation, it's a tool and I have work to do. I ended up contacting BBB and doing a swap for a new 2025.

Connecticut (not verified)    December 4, 2024 - 5:02PM

I just want to say thank all of you for sharing these experiences so individuals like my self can have inside about these trucks. As for my self I have looking to purchase a Silverado or gmc Denali and I have been going back and forth with reviews and prices points. Seeing reviews on how these vehicles are standing up and are not reliable let alone being at an $100 thousand dollar price points is ridiculous. So as for me seeing all these issues with these truck being new I'm not interested anymore. I'll just stick with staying with Toyota brand whom I have had no issues with being that I'm on my third one. Nothing to do with reliability due to accidents.

Just want to say thanks for the info