Skip to main content

Parking Garages in New York are Refusing to Park Tesla Cybertrucks, They Say, “Insurance Companies Have Asked Them Not to”

A Cybertruck owner who took his truck to Manhattan says several parking garages refused to let him park his vehicle in their facilities. The owner adds that liability insurance providers covering the parking garages are behind the silent boycott.

Atul Sharma is a Cybertruck owner from New York, and he says there is a concerted Cybertruck ban across several parking garages in the city.

We just published an update to this story, discussing a possible weighty argument of why some New York parking garage owners allegedly may not allow Tesla Cybertrucks apparently on insurance orders.

Atul first noticed this phenomenon when he drove his Cybertruck to Manhattan for work. However, he was surprised to learn that none of the parking garages he tried were willing to let him park his Cybertruck on their property.

Atul shared his experience on the Cybertruck Owners Only group on Facebook. Here is what he wrote…

“I live in New York, and today, I decided to drive my Cybertruck to work in Manhattan. I was shocked to find out that none of the parking garages accept Cybertrucks.”

This is certainly a surprising development, and fortunately for those of us wondering what is going on, Atul did not simply accept their ban but chose to inquire why they were refusing to let him park his Cybertruck.

In this video, we discuss the possible reasons for a Cybertruck ban, including a possible political motivation, which you can watch at the Torque News Youtube Channel.

 

According to the Cybertruck owner, the parking garage ban for the Cybertruck has come about under the direct recommendation of insurance companies that provide liability coverage for the parking facilities.

Continuing his post, Atul writes…

“According to the parking garage operators, their insurance companies have asked them not to accept any Cybertrucks.”

Finally, Atul says the insurance companies passed the directive not to accept Cybertrucks “because Cybertrucks are very expensive and are not covered by the insurance policy.”

Atul was unhappy that he was singled out for driving a Cybertruck; however, in the comments, other Cybertruck owners shared their personal experiences of being denied various services for driving the vehicle.

Sam Cohen writes…

“I got the same exact comment from a couple of car washes in New Jersey. I’m like, that’s a way more expensive Mercedes S 550 in front of me…”

Another Cybertruck owner, Jayme DiSaverio, adds, “We were also turned away by several car washes in New Jersey—we were told the truck was too big and would damage the equipment—my husband was so annoyed.”

Returning to Atul’s case, it’s important to discuss why the parking garages refused to let him park his Cybertruck.

The immediate reason he received was that the Cybertruck was too expensive for liability purposes. However, this argument doesn’t hold water. Given how expensive vehicles have gotten recently, a $100,000 vehicle is nowhere in the exotic car category.

This argument is especially hard to believe in Manhattan. Jeev Yatigammana writes, “Aren’t all those Range Rovers, Lambo’s, Ferraris, Porsches, and S Classes and so on way more expensive than the Cybertruck? What gives with these places? Jeez.”

Tanya Hynd adds, “That's nonsense! There are a lot of cars in Manhattan that cost more than the Cybertruck, and they let them in! Like I said - it's nonsense!”

In the comments, people seem to think a better explanation is that the Cybertruck ban is politically motivated.

Glenn Crabtree writes, “Could it be a silent boycott due to Elon Musk's backing of our President-elect?”

Other theories include the Cybertruck ban being due to fears about EV fires or maybe the fact that the Cybertruck is a new vehicle.

Overall, it’s surprising to see more and more businesses denying Cybertruck owners services. Please let me know what you think about this phenomenon in the comments. Share your ideas by clicking the red “Add new comment” button below. Also, visit our site, torquenews.com/Tesla, regularly for the latest updates.

Image: Screenshot from Joe Tegtmeyer's YouTube channel

For more information, check out: Tesla Cybertruck Owners With a Vinyl Wrap Are Finding the Stainless Steel Becomes Permanently Blemished After Removing the Wrap

Tinsae Aregay has been following Tesla and the evolution of the EV space daily for several years. He covers everything about Tesla, from the cars to Elon Musk, the energy business, and autonomy. Follow Tinsae on Twitter at @TinsaeAregay for daily Tesla news.

Comments

Thomas Schenk (not verified)    November 17, 2024 - 7:39AM

If it is I would not be surprised if it was because of the weight of the vehicle. Most multi story parking facilities in this country were not built to accommodate the weight of EVs, which are 30% heavier than gasoline based passenger vehicles.

Jana (not verified)    November 17, 2024 - 7:49AM

I've seen a number of other news articles in the past, that parking garage structures are collapsing. The EV's weight is considerably heavier, due to the batteries, than the weight of cars run by gasoline, and the parking structures were not engineered to withstand the increased weight. Insurance claims provide the truths.

Charles Roberts (not verified)    November 17, 2024 - 10:33AM

Get Elon musk to build you a parking garage, and come over and wash it for you. If I didn't want the truck in my yard, I'd tell you one time only to get that trash out my yard. Park at the plantation on Pennsylvania Avenue.

Just me (not verified)    November 17, 2024 - 10:54AM

Could it be due to their size? The liability might have more to do with other cars being damaged because cyber trucks may not fit.

Chinonso Aniakor (not verified)    November 17, 2024 - 11:59AM

This sounds politically motivated to me as there's no saner reason to reject cyber trucks in a place with way more expensive car brands.

Dave Dee (not verified)    November 17, 2024 - 9:22PM

Something that might surprise the average reader is that no top tier safety organization has tested the Cybertruck. The EPA hadn’t nor the IIHS. So basically nobody knows the true potential risk associated with the Cybertruck.
Musk used a loophole to get this vehicle to market.
Another example of him leaving his sycophants holding the bag.
Like who will be liable for the CyberTaxi?