One of the most tiresome, circular arguments I get in with my smart and intelligent readers is when I call the Ford Mustang a muscle car. Several smarty-pants (and I use that term affectionately) chime in and say well the Mustang isn’t technically a muscle car, you know. Yeah, yeah, I know. But if you poll the average (non-enthusiast) and ask what kind of car the Mustang is, they’ll likely say either muscle car or sports car. And the fact is, it’s not either technically, and yet it also sort of is. Confused yet? Let’s take a look closer and see if we can nail it all down.
Is the Ford Mustang a Muscle Car?
Loosely defined, a muscle car is an American car with rear-wheel drive fitted with a powerful (V8) engine. Most car historians trace the first muscle car back to 1949 with the Oldsmobile Rocket. This car was fast (for its time) with a V8 engine dropped into it. While the Mustang early on had a V8 engine in it (289 HiPo) many would say the Mustang didn’t become a muscle car until 428 Cobra Jet was introduced in 1968. That plus the Shelby modifications really put the Mustang on the map when it came to performance. And really, the late 1960s Mustangs were muscle cars by this definition. But as the Mustang evolved through the years, it lost its muscle, and didn’t really get back into that conversation until introduction of the 5.0 engine during the Fox Body era. Then it once again became a darling of the performance and muscle car enthusiasts.
Today, the purists (the aforementioned know-it-alls) will say that the Dodge Challenger is the last remaining true muscle car. And by those narrow definitions they’re technically correct. Although, today’s Mustang GT350 and GT500 have plenty of power and performance. With the independent rear suspensions of today’s Mustang GTs many would consider them a sports car rather than a muscle car. But if you want to call them a muscle car, I won’t split hairs and argue with you.
What Exactly Is A Pony Car?
Let’s be clear. The Ford Mustang is the original pony car. It created a new segment in the automotive industry. And throughout its rich history, year after year, for more than 55 years now, the Ford Mustang is a pony car. That has never changed. A pony car, by definition, is a low-slung highly stylized coupe or convertible with a long hood and short deck. That loose definition best describes the Mustang as it was designed originally by Gale Halderman and still applies today. The Chevy Camaro and Dodge Challenger are also pony cars. And these rivals have competed against each other for decades, with Ford coming out on top most years, including the last several years. Pony cars aren’t dependent on their engine performance; thus today’s Ecoboost Mustangs qualify as pony cars, but not as muscle cars. Small block V8s, big block V8s or six or even four-cylinder engines all qualify for the pony car category.
So, for simplicity purposes, all Mustangs are pony cars, plain and simple. There’s no disputing that.
Is a Ford Mustang A Sports Car?
The definition of a sports car is more generic, but some sports car characteristics certainly apply to today’s Mustang and even some of the 1960s era Shelby Mustangs too. They’re meant to be sleek, and performance oriented with aerodynamic designs and engineered as such. Sports cars combine sleek looks with high-power engines. Obviously, the Mustang fits into nicely. As noted, today’s Ford GTs most closely fit into the sports car category and compete against the likes the Corvette more than the Camaro.
So, for me, the Ford Mustang GT is a sports car, and honestly if you want to call some of the high-power Mustang coupes and convertibles of modern era a sports car, I won’t bicker with you about it. There are even many publications that throw the Mustang into the sports car ranking when doing comparisons. The easiest way to differentiate a sports car from a muscle car is in the handling. Muscle cars, like the Dodge Challenger are all about straight away, raw power and focus less on handling.
A sports car, like the Chevy Corvette or the Mustang GT would do well cornering on a track, thus they qualify as sports cars.
So this hopefully clears up the debate, but likely just muddied the waters more. To summarize, all Mustangs are pony cars. Some Mustangs are muscle cars. And some Mustangs are sports cars. But all Ford Mustangs are iconic (except for the Mach-E). You know I had to get that jab in about the four-wheel drive, crossover pretending to be a Mustang.
See you in my next story discussing how much muscle the four cylinder Ford Mustang has.
Jimmy Dinsmore has been an automotive journalist for more than a decade and been a writer since the high school. His Driver’s Side column features new car reviews and runs in several newspapers throughout the country. In addition to being a nationally syndicated automotive columnist, Jimmy has been published in a compilation book about children growing up with disabilities, where he shared his own very personal experience. He is also co-author of the book “Mustang by Design” and “Ford Trucks: A Unique Look at the Technical History of America’s Most Popular Truck”. Also, Jimmy works in the social media marketing world for a Canadian automotive training aid manufacturing company. Follow Jimmy on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.
Comments
The mustang is a personal
Permalink
The mustang is a personal getaway vehicle. The look and speed is entirely ones own choice.
The Mustang is an American
Permalink
The Mustang is an American ICON. What it isn't is an SUV and Ford is doing damage to its ICON vehicle by slapping a running horse on an Electric SUV and calling it Mustang.
No question Dean!
Permalink
In reply to The Mustang is an American by Dean Ricci (not verified)
No question Dean!
That makes a lot of sense.
Permalink
In reply to The Mustang is an American by Dean Ricci (not verified)
That makes a lot of sense. When you talk about a Mustang you automatically think of a V8. The 2.3 four cylinder or a hybrid is not a real Mustang.
I don't agree. As I wrote
Permalink
In reply to That makes a lot of sense. by Hamish Archibald (not verified)
I don't agree. As I wrote yesterday, the four-cylinder Ecoboost has a lot of power. More than many of the older V8s that get credit for being a muscle car. Over 300 hp from the Ecoboost.
It's a performance vehicle,
Permalink
In reply to The Mustang is an American by Dean Ricci (not verified)
It's a performance vehicle, even if it's electric the quoted figure is 3s to 60mph for the performance edition
Sales numbers say something
Permalink
In reply to The Mustang is an American by Dean Ricci (not verified)
Sales numbers say something very different.
Actually the mustang for
Permalink
Actually the mustang for quite some time like it or not is a sports car. It's more European buy design like it or not, especially if you judge it buy the drivetrain and rear independent suspension. When you really look at the must it's like Ford wants to be more European than an American car Company.
Mustang is now a Japanese
Permalink
Mustang is now a Japanese-looking sports car. Thank heavens for Challenger!
Ugh!
Permalink
In reply to Mustang is now a Japanese by william goszinski (not verified)
Ugh!
Mr. Dinsmore, you should be
Permalink
In reply to Ugh! by Jimmy Dinsmore
Mr. Dinsmore, you should be proud. You struck a nerve with the motor heads. A group of unrelated men so passionate about their love of the screaming V-8’s that America (definitely including Canada) does better than anybody. Salute.
While modern Mustangs may be
Permalink
While modern Mustangs may be called muscle cars, what they really are a bunch of steel and plastic of bad taste, suitable for butchers.
Your definition of a sports
Permalink
Your definition of a sports car:
"They’re meant to be sleek, and performance oriented with aerodynamic designs and engineered as such. Sports cars combine sleek looks with high-power engines."
By this definition, what is a Mazda MX5 and/or Fiat 124? How about the Alfa Romeo 4C? (only 234 horsepower)
That's the beauty of it. How
Permalink
That's the beauty of it. How do you define it? I wouldn't call the Miata a sports car, but it's certainly sporty to drive. It overperforms its output numbers. Same with the "Fiata" Spyder.
I was at the Mustang Rally at
Permalink
I was at the Mustang Rally at Sturgis, SD last year & many of us owners think that the Muscle Car image ended in ‘14. Starting with ‘15 - we call them the Euro Mustangs because it has a low wide rearend somewhat similar to a Porsche 911. Aside from the ‘65 thru ‘73s. I like the ‘11 thru ‘14s the best. Massive HP, reliable, good gas mileage & still has that down hill look ..... with Brakes !! Unlike the 60 / 70s.
It is all good, we as
Permalink
In reply to I was at the Mustang Rally at by Mark Hayes (not verified)
It is all good, we as consumers buy what we like. With that being said, I just bought a use one owner untouched 2011 Mustang GT 5.0. The Coyote Power plant is why I purchased this car. My philosophy is diffrent categories of Mustang owners..1. Purest buy one, do nothing and drive it on weekends. 2. Mototerheads buy one, as a project car. 3. Speed freaks buy one to race. 4. Attentin getters buy one, to look cool and get those attaboys. 5. Wemon buy one because they fall in love with the car they pick. By the way, and may wear their heart on their sleeve. Anyway you look at it, get one and call it your own. Mine I don't even call a Mustang, I call it the COYOTE!!!
I always drove the real
Permalink
I always drove the real muscle cars, ‘67 Firebird, ‘71 SS Camaro, even my ‘86 Trans Am and ‘95 Trans Am seemed like muscle cars. Second gear rubber with a factory automatic. But the new muscle cars just don’t seem as raw. An 8 speed automatic is way too smooth and I don’t want to shift gears every time I go to Walmart. Do they have a daily driver muscle car anymore for guys like me who want to comfortably drive around until some punk in a Honda revs his rice burner and I eat his lunch?
This is so unnecessary
Permalink
This is so unnecessary discussion. Acceleration to 100 km/h in 4,2 sec sounds pretty sporty. That all. The name "ponycar" is such a ridiculous name it makes the Ford Mustang pathetic, unserious and toy-like. I will never call my Mustang for ponycar. I don't even want to hear this name anymore.
I understand your take,
Permalink
In reply to This is so unnecessary by Ango (not verified)
I understand your take, believe me I do. But as someone who covers the industry, we get stuck too often in labels. And if I call a Mustang a muscle car, some will come down on me. But I understand what your'e saying and agree with your premise. In the auto industry there isn't a "pony car" segment. They're either sports car or muscle car.
It's a muscle car,
Permalink
It's a muscle car, performance car, sports car, personal car, gone in the blink of an eye car. It is not a taxi. It is not a family car. It is not a truck. It is not a station wagon.
And what it is, it excels at admirably. Period.
Yes, great performance but it
Permalink
Yes, great performance but it reminds me of a Nissan Z car from several angles
Yes, Nissan has done a good
Permalink
In reply to Yes, great performance but it by Bill g (not verified)
Yes, Nissan has done a good job at using Ford designs cues. Especially their full size trucks.
RIght? If anything you can
Permalink
In reply to Yes, Nissan has done a good by RICK SIDENSTRICKER (not verified)
RIght? If anything you can say the Z looks like a Ford, not the other way around. Plus, I don't see much similarity between the Z and the Mustang. They're two totally different cars. Both have their merits.
Ford Mustang is a pony car...
Permalink
Ford Mustang is a pony car....not that you cant make them fast or handle well,
But there far from a sports car.
No need to "make them handle"
Permalink
In reply to Ford Mustang is a pony car... by Craig skripek (not verified)
No need to "make them handle" if you know about Mustangs you can simply spec one out to your expectations.
An excellent educational opportunity.
An amazing car that is available at your Ford dealer.
I don't know why this is so
Permalink
I don't know why this is so hard.
Pony Car. Is a sporty 2 door coupe or vert that is still practical. Not necessarily fast or great at the track, but fun to drive. Has seats for 4.
Muscle Car: car originally designed as family transportation but has since been installed with a high output high displacement engine. Great for quick acceleration times but not very good handling around corners. Can be 2 or 4 doors. Always has seats for 4.
Sports Car: Car designed to have the best performance in power and handling attainable. Always a 2 seater. Usually a convertible or with removable tops but can be a fixed roof too.
As an owner of a '65 A code
Permalink
As an owner of a '65 A code convertible and a 2021 Mach-E AWD Performance, I don't have any problem with the Mach-E being a Mustang. Evolve or die, like the Camaro is going to do for a second time. "Purists" would have the Mustang cease production is opposed to evolve. Heck, my Mach-E out performs most "Mustangs" ever produced.
It along with the Corvette
Permalink
It along with the Corvette are yardsticks of which all else is judged. When you say you own a Mustang people go… you own a Mustang???!!! I’m sure it’s the same for a Corvette.
Yes. Iconic. Along with the
Permalink
In reply to It along with the Corvette by Terry Shell (not verified)
Yes. Iconic. Along with the Camaro, Charger and Challenger. Yet each car is very different in execution.
Seek what you love, drive what you love. Let the haters hate.
It's a great time to love cars.
Muscle cars don't exist
Permalink
Muscle cars don't exist anymore because even the Challenger can turn.
I hate to say it, but a lot of these definitions don't make sense any more. Turbo 6 cylinders do under 4 sec 0-60s. A Mercedes SL is a 12 sec drag car. A Camaro can do over 1 g on a skidpad.
Just how does one group cars, the equipment and the performance envelope to support "muscle" "sports" or any other description?