My first time in the Ford Ranger was right after Ford relaunched the smaller truck in 2019. The model I was in was stripped down and bare boned. In my review back then I was critical of how outdated the Ranger felt and how it lacked much of the pizzazz needed to compete in the truck segment.
While it’s true that trucks aren’t always glitzy and glamorous, especially in the compact truck segment, they still need to have enough. After spending a week in the 2020 Ford Ranger Lariat Supercrew, I’m ready to proclaim that the Ranger can compete with the Toyota Tacoma.
The Ranger and Tacoma are familiar rivals. The Tacoma has been around since 1995. At that time sales of the Ranger were starting to tail off a little. Ford would eventually eliminate the Ranger in the North American market by 2012, while the Tacoma remained, almost unrivaled as other auto manufacturers also jumped out of the segment. And as my colleague John Goreham wrote, the Tacoma has thrived atop the segment.
As such, Toyota was able to gain a strong footing amongst consumers who wanted a smaller truck. But, during this time, Toyota got somewhat complacent. And as Ford re-engaged in the segment, Toyota could no longer sit back on its laurels with the Tacoma.
Towing and Payload Comparison
You hear a lot about payload and towing in the full-size truck segment, where Ford dominates with the F-150, but since re-engaging in the compact truck segment with the Ranger, Ford has decided to make an emphasis on how much of a work-capable truck the Ranger is.
And it shows as the Ranger beats the Tacoma in both payload and maximum towing capacity. The Ranger leads the segment with a payload of 1,650 pounds, compared to the Tacoma’s 1,095 pounds. Standard towing, Tacoma takes the edge, but when properly equipped with maximum towing capacity, the Ranger wins the head-to-head battle with a max towing capacity of 7,500 pounds compared to the Tacoma’s 6,400 pounds.
If these are the numbers the consumer looks at, then the Ranger wins handily.
Tale of the tape: Tacoma vs. Ranger
It’s funny, I remember the Ranger of the 1990s and early 2000s as looking and feeling small. My first impression from the 2019 Ranger was that it looked like it was the same size as the F-150 and it certainly drove big.
That isn’t necessarily the case with the Tacomas I’ve driven. The Tundra drives big and hulky. And the Tacoma, even with the rugged and rough-riding TRD trim, still doesn’t feel like a behemoth. I will say that my time in the 2020 Ranger it did feel smaller and drove smaller.
That’s a good thing, to be clear. And looking at the dimensions it’s a weird head-to-head comparison. The Tacoma wins the tale of the tape in length with 212.3 inches to the Ranger’s 210.8. The Tacoma also edges out on wheelbase by a small fraction.
The Ranger is 1.1 inches wider than the Tacoma and nearly an inch taller. And the bed length, one of the biggest selling points for truck consumers, the Ranger is much bigger with a bed length of 72.8 inches to the Tacoma’s 60.5 inches.
Comparing the engines of the Toyota Tacoma to the Ford Ranger
Where I believe Toyota has sat still for too long is in the powertrain of the Tacoma. The Tacoma only has a six-speed automatic transmission that is adequate, but uninspiring. In the 2020 Ford Ranger there’s Ford’s new 10-speed automatic transmission. It throws the shifts around seamlessly and does a great job in the lower gears too.
When driving a truck, even a smaller one, it’s all about torque for me. While the Tacoma’s engine puts out slightly more horsepower (278 hp compared to 270 hp), the Ranger’s 2.3-liter four-cylinder turbocharged engine offers up significantly more torque than the Tacoma (310 lb.-ft. to 265 lb.-ft.
The energetic turbocharged engine in the Ranger feels more vibrant and more powerful. Ford has really done a great job with their turbo technology in both the Ranger and the F-150 (and even the Mustang for that matter).
The Ranger also wins the fuel economy battle with the Tacoma clocking in at 18 mpg/city and 22 mpg/highway to the Ranger’s 20/24 rating.
Off road capability: Ranger FX4 vs. Tacoma TRD
Ford knew they were behind in this consideration so they added the FX2 package to the Ranger in the 2020 model year. When appointed with the FX4 it is pretty rugged and capable.
There aren’t true measurables to determine which one is better, but Toyota has mastered the off-road trim by offering a special, and pricey, TRD trim. It is a beast off the beaten path. So the Tacoma won’t get outdueled in the mud and rock by the Ranger, even one appointed with the FX2 of FX4 trim.
The Ranger I drove was able to toggle between two-wheel drive and four-wheel low or high. That is a nice option to only use all the wheels when you need them, rather than all the time, and costing fuel economy too.
Comparing the interior of the Ford Ranger to the Toyota Tacoma
Toyota has sat back for a while and let a lot of their competition catch them in interior quality. It’s especially obvious when looking at some of their sedan line. In the truck world, it’s also the case.
While the Ranger isn’t dripping with luxury (like some F-150 trims), it has enough. My tester was the Lariat trim which is the swankiest trim available. It comes with remote start, Ford’s SYNC3 infotainment system, and leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob.
I often think trucks are too over-the-top appointed, and thus too expensive, so I think the Ranger finds its sweet spot when it comes to appointments and touch points. Comparing the two, the Ranger’s interior feels a little more updated and a little nicer than the Tacoma’s.
Both infotainment systems are easy to use, but I do like the vast improvements Ford’s made to the Sync3 system and I look forward to the soon-to-be-released Sync4. Toyota is due a major overhaul of the Tacoma and of the interior for sure in order to remain relevant.
Which is more expensive, the Toyota Tacoma or the Ford Ranger?
Price is king. It’s really hard to do an apples-to-apples comparison of the two trucks, but looking at the Toyota Tacoma Limited vs. the Ford Ranger Lariat Supercab and the Ranger is less expensive (depending on how it’s appointed).
According to cargurus.com, the 2020 Tacoma has an average price paid of $39,907 to the Ranger’s $35,137. My tester was fully loaded and had a starting price of $38,675. With options and the Lariat package it had a final MSRP of $46,990.
I always hear about prices from readers and I get it. Everything is expensive, even these smaller trucks.
So, there’s a pretty fair comparison of the Toyota Tacoma and the Ford Ranger. As always, things are subjective. I like both trucks. If you had asked me last year which I liked better, I would’ve given the edge to the Tacoma. But after an impressive week with the 2020 Ranger, appointed the way I like it, the edge in my book goes slightly to the Ranger now. Hey, competition is good, so hopefully this segment continues to heat up and the consumer wins out with the ensuing competition.
Related story: KBB awards Ford Ranger Lowest 5-Year Cost To Own.
I want to hear from you tried and true Toyota fans out there too. Where did I go wrong? Am I wrong? Leave your comments for a good discussion. Also be sure to check out my thoughts on why the 2021 Ford F-150 is better than the 2021 Toyota Tundra.
Jimmy Dinsmore has been an automotive journalist for more than a decade and been a writer since the high school. His Driver’s Side column features new car reviews and runs in several newspapers throughout the country. He is also co-author of the book “Mustang by Design” and “Ford Trucks: A Unique Look at the Technical History of America’s Most Popular Truck”. Also, Jimmy works in the social media marketing world for a Canadian automotive training aid manufacturing company. Follow Jimmy on Facebook, Twitter, at his special Ford F-150 coverage on Twitter and LinkedIn. You can read the most of Jimmy's stories by searching Torque News Ford for daily Ford vehicle report.
Comments
Try again. You're not as
Permalink
In reply to It was a typo that was fixed. by Jimmy Dinsmore
Try again. You're not as wrong as before but you still have the widths mixed up. It's the Tacoma that is wider. You're also still confused about the bed lengths. You're just comparing long bed vs short bed options.
2005 f150. 358xxx. Original
Permalink
2005 f150. 358xxx. Original engine and transmission. Never been opened. No rust. 5.4 v8. Still get 17 mpg on a road trip. I hear a lot about Toyota’s. Just not many with this many miles
Everyone has different
Permalink
Everyone has different experiences with different brands. When talk of longevity is in play, it's easy to look at older used trucks for sale and check mileage. For people saying toyotas are known for reliability, look search 2004-2009 ford rangers for sale. There are plenty with over 200-300k. The rangers were good dependable trucks. That being said, I do love the looks of the tacoma over the ford myself.
Incorrect Data. The Tacoma
Permalink
Incorrect Data. The Tacoma can tow up to 6800lbs for V6 all models.
I have been buying used cars
Permalink
I have been buying used cars of all makes and models, and found that there are dependent on the engine. Toyota engines seem to have the best reliability. Other makes have built good engines as well, however not all there engines last as long. This year I was leaning on three truck choices:
The new Ford Ranger 4 cyl. Turbo
The new Chevrolet Silverado LT 4 cyl Turbo
The Toyota Tacoma 4 cyl.
I went with the Toyota truck only because the engine is reputable and known to go 350k miles plus.
The other two engines well, still guinea pigs...
First new truck, and I believe I made the better choice for the buck.
Your logic is sound and hard
Permalink
In reply to I have been buying used cars by Frank Machado (not verified)
Your logic is sound and hard to argue with.
The Ranger has no manual
Permalink
The Ranger has no manual option in the US, easy victory for the Taco
I have own a ranger before
Permalink
I have own a ranger before got rid of it at 2100 miles. My 1st taco had over 200,000 on it before I got my 2nd one . Down the road I don't think the Ford will last.
You went wrong because people
Permalink
You went wrong because people buy tacomas for reliability something ford heavily has struggled with especially in their turbo charged models like the f150
No question that Toyota has
Permalink
In reply to You went wrong because people by Mike d (not verified)
No question that Toyota has hung their hat on reliability, but in doing so, they have done very little else to keep the Tacoma relevant.
I agree wholeheartedly.
Permalink
In reply to No question that Toyota has by Jimmy Dinsmore
I agree wholeheartedly.
I bought a 2020 xlt for 33000
Permalink
I bought a 2020 xlt for 33000 and love the truck. Buy a Tacoma if you want as I am sure they are nice, I do love my midsize Ford
I just bought a 2021 Tacoma.
Permalink
I just bought a 2021 Tacoma. I have always loved the Ranger, especially the 80's incarnations. So I did extensive research, test drove both trucks and I have to whole heatedly disagree with the statement on the interior comparison. The Tacoma blows the Ranger out of the water with the quality of it's interior. Also the longevity of the Tacoma compared to the Ranger makes it clear choice. I love the Ranger but it didn't wow me, also I don't care what anybody says, a 4 cylinder turbo engine is still a 4 cylinder turbo engine when compared to a V6, it does not belong in a truck(and I own and love 4 cylinder turbo engines, I have a Subaru WRX).
I would like to see a video
Permalink
I would like to see a video of a ranger with a million miles , sorry dude but is no comparison the tacoma is better . Go to YouTube an search high millage trucks you will see with tacoma is the king when it comes to small trucks.
As I stated in the article, I
Permalink
As I stated in the article, I made no claims to long term. I know the Tacoma's history with long term value and I mention that and give them credit. But I don't have a crystal ball and can't say one for a certainty will last longer than the other. THat was not how I was comparing the two. I was comparing them in apples to apples from the early point of purchase.
I have worked for Ford for
Permalink
I have worked for Ford for over 25 years. I own a 2019 Ranger. 50k miles, zero problems. Ford looked at the competition and one upped them. Don't believe me? Hasn't been that long ago some guys from the Toyota dealership were visiting our parts department to buy some accessories for a Ranger one of them had bought because they stated the seats of the tacoma were uncomfortable and the composite bed could be cracked in the winter if you weren't careful. So, take advice from the Toyota guys and get a Ranger.
Sorry for the flash news.
Permalink
Sorry for the flash news. Some ford fans may be truly lovers for the collectables trucks or speed cars but japanese cars are built better. I had a
14'fj and few colleagues raptors but toyota.just see how a Toyota hold it's value vs a ford.
Ranger vs Tacoma. Truth is I
Permalink
Ranger vs Tacoma. Truth is I don't really care, either one will work but $40,000 for a compact truck is ridiculous. It's a truck, these crew cab limo wannabes that break the bank are totally unnecessary, it's a truck. I had a 94 F150 that I hated and an 89 Nissan D21 that was great but they were trucks, I hate these candy ass, computer screened bank breakers...
Ford will never developed a
Permalink
Ford will never developed a truck that can last more than 1 year without breaking down. That's the test!
A slight exaggeration
Permalink
In reply to Ford will never developed a by Richard Bulmer (not verified)
A slight exaggeration
"The Ranger I drove was able
Permalink
"The Ranger I drove was able to toggle between two-wheel drive and four-wheel low or high. That is a nice option to only use all the wheels when you need them, rather than all the time, and costing fuel economy too"
With the last of that statement the author lost all credibility with me to give a review of any truck.
Thanks for reading . . . 15
Permalink
In reply to "The Ranger I drove was able by Jesse (not verified)
Thanks for reading . . . 15 years covering the auto industry
15 years and you somehow find
Permalink
In reply to Thanks for reading . . . 15 by Jimmy Dinsmore
15 years and you somehow find the ability to choose between 2wd and 4wd novel and "advantageous" over a Tacoma? Wow
The bed comparison is total
Permalink
The bed comparison is total bull. Look at both in double cab and both in access cab. You did the ranger in access and the Tacoma in double cab short bed. There virtually identical. I’ve owned both since the middle 90s. It’s preference and features. Nice try butt plug do your research first anal wipe.
I'm basically a Ford guy but
Permalink
I'm basically a Ford guy but when we decided to get a mid-sized truck in January we went with the Tacoma. This truck will be used extensively for offroading, exploring and hunting. The other brands don't come close in offroad ability except for Jeep, but then you're sacrificing reliability.
Let's see even 1 of those
Permalink
Let's see even 1 of those Ford rangers go 400k+ miles, then we may have a contender to knock off Toyota. FYI. Its not likely.
Spare tire is not the same
Permalink
Spare tire is not the same size rim....and consider a temp tire only...and is recommend not to drive over 50 MPH
Be aware of this..
Before you buy a Ford ranger..you can request same size rim...not sure of tire?
Aloha
Thank you for that info
Permalink
In reply to Spare tire is not the same by Jeffery Lorance (not verified)
Thank you for that info
The writer needs to do actual
Permalink
The writer needs to do actual research! There is no such thing as a max tow package with the Ranger, every Ranger no matter the trim has the same towing capacity unlike the Tacoma! This writer is an idiot!
The Trailer Tow Package,
Permalink
In reply to The writer needs to do actual by Matt (not verified)
The Trailer Tow Package, which has to be added (i.e. bought) increases the Ranger towing capacity (thus max towing capacity) to 7,500 pounds. I'm just an idiot, but this info is available on the internet and Ford's site, where I did research. Google Trailer Tow Package 53R.
Pagination