Skip to main content

September 27th News Topics

hello

Nicolas Zart    September 28, 2012 - 10:31AM

In reply to by David Herron

does a good job at stating available battery pack, 31.5 kWh and although they talk about EPA estimated 88 milers, they're quick to point out to the UDDS 133 mile, wqhich makes them say about 125 miles on average depending on driving habits, etc. I think we need to move away from quote epa ratings and that nonsense of MPGe. We just can't compared these cars to gasoline cars, period. Nissan is swallowing the humility pill. No humongous booth at AltCar Expo!

David Herron    September 28, 2012 - 10:44AM

In reply to by Nicolas Zart

Uh.. I have a different stance on this. The EPA certification is supposed to be the metric we compare the vehicles with. If there's something wrong with the EPA certification, then that is what needs to be fixed.

When Coda says "125 miles" with an asterisk leading to the admission that this is not the EPA certification ... to me this looks bad. It looks like they're trying to amplify the advertised number to look better.

Their 125 miles range is at city street speeds (LA4 test cycle). Someone whose daily commute is 90 miles each way might see "125 miles range" and think the car will do what they need, but be surprised when the car barely does the commute. That's the difference between highway speed range and city street speed range. It takes more energy to go faster - this is based on physics because at higher speed the car is pushing more air out of the way.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments_filter

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul> <ol'> <code> <li> <i>
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.