In a post on the Lucid Owners Club Facebook Group, Steven Long shared his shocking experience of purchasing a Lucid Air demo unit that had allegedly been in an accident and repaired without disclosure from the seller. Despite his love for the Lucid brand and the car's impressive performance, Long was dismayed to discover that his vehicle had been repainted and likely sustained damage to the front bumper and passenger door. The incident was not mentioned during the "difficult" sales process, which also involved mismatched photos and lengthy delays.
Long expressed his frustration with Lucid's customer service, stating that they failed to return his calls and emails regarding the issue, leaving him with a damaged vehicle and few options for recourse. The responses to his post, while varied, painted a clearer picture of the situation.
So. Lucid. I absolutely love it. The story, the brand, the driving dynamics. The range. I’m a car guyand it’s simply incredible.
However... I bought a 6k mi demo unit. Never titled. And undisclosed by everyone in sales was an a... ccident. The front hood and bumper have been repainted (verified with a paint depth gauge). The passenger side door has a chip where the hood contacted it. This is after a very difficult sales process. The pictures I was sent of the car didn’t match (pics of the front were in a different studio) and other shady details I won’t bore you with.
Customer service has failed to return my calls and emails despite numerous people being made aware of the issue. I have only one other choice, which I don’t want to do. But I am well within my legal rights as what I have described is illegal.
I am writing this in hopes that someone in management will reach out and contact me as I am aware these groups are monitored.
Several commenters shared their own negative experiences with Lucid's customer service, describing unreturned calls, emails, and a general lack of responsiveness. Forum member Arif Hafeez claimed that his sales representative and titling staff ceased communication shortly after he took delivery of his vehicle, an issue he elevated to Lucid corporate with no resolution.
What Is Lucid Motors?
- Lucid Motors is a California-based luxury electric vehicle manufacturer known for its high-performance, long-range EVs like the Air sedan and the upcoming Gravity SUV.
- The Lucid Air has received accolades for its exceptional driving dynamics, advanced technology, and opulent interior, solidifying its position as one of the most compelling new offerings in the EV market.
What Commenters Thought
Other commenters, such as Spott Randolph and Loc Tang, questioned the validity of Long's claims, suggesting that he should have pulled a Carfax or Autocheck report prior to purchasing the vehicle. They maintained that any damage exceeding $500 or accompanied by a police report should be listed on the vehicle's record, even if it had never been officially titled. Tang further noted that a paint depth gauge test alone may not be sufficient evidence of the accident, as OEM paint jobs are not always perfectly uniform.
Despite the conflicting opinions and advice, the overarching sentiment of the thread was one of caution and concern for potential buyers. Forum members advised those considering a Lucid purchase to thoroughly inspect the vehicle, verify the VIN, and inquire directly about any potential damage or repairs. The thread also sparked a broader discussion about the merits and pitfalls of buying demo units and the importance of transparency in automotive sales.
A Poor Experience
Ultimately, Long's disheartening experience with his Lucid Air serves as a reminder for all car buyers, whether they are enthusiasts or first-time owners, to remain vigilant and thorough when making a purchase. While the Lucid brand and its groundbreaking electric vehicles have garnered significant praise from the automotive community, the alleged lack of disclosure and customer support in this situation has cast a shadow over what should have been a celebratory moment for a new car owner.
As the thread progressed, Long indicated that he had been put in touch with a contact at Lucid, offering hope for a potential resolution. However, the incident raises important questions about the trust and transparency that should exist between manufacturers, sellers and the buying public.
How would you react if you purchased a car and discovered this? Leave your comments down below.
Noah Washington is an automotive journalist based in Atlanta, Georgia. He enjoys covering the latest news in the automotive industry and conducting reviews on the latest cars. He has been in the automotive industry since 15 years old and has been featured in prominent automotive news sites. You can reach him on X and LinkedIn for tips and to follow his automotive coverage.
Comments
Get in touch w the CFPB!
Permalink
Get in touch w the CFPB!
I image that the Consumer…
Permalink
In reply to Get in touch w the CFPB! by David Galatt (not verified)
I image that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would be the best course of action as well if what he said was accurate.
Thank you
Permalink
In reply to I image that the Consumer… by Noah Washington
Thank you
6k mi demo unit is not new…
Permalink
6k mi demo unit is not new but failing to report in previous damage is not right. But the point is … how heavily the damage is there and does it damage the driving units or its just a cosmetic damage. I believe there is already a discount on a demo unit, why don't just bargain for an additional service package for later use? Anyways best wishes for bargains, most sale center push off for these situations or you might consider to return the car if it really bothers you.
It is brand new as it is…
Permalink
In reply to 6k mi demo unit is not new… by Michael Kwong (not verified)
It is brand new as it is never titled. Legally it is a new car. I would looooove to bargon with them, 13 weeks into this I still have no proposed resolution. They take weeks to respond to the simplest request for information. Hence telling my story.
I agree, if damage was done…
Permalink
In reply to 6k mi demo unit is not new… by Michael Kwong (not verified)
I agree, if damage was done it should've been reported.
First I am not saying I don…
Permalink
First I am not saying I don’t believe you. I am interested in hearing more of the details. Personally I don’t know if buying a demo unit makes a difference. A demo would infer that it had been driven 6,000 miles (in your case) and let’s say there were minor rock chips or a cracked windshield or even upholstery parts replaced maybe? Before passing judgement that anyone tried to defraud you i would need to know more.
How did you find out? Did you check CarFax? As far as different studios a demo unit could easily be in different studios. That wouldn’t be an issue.
I agree, more details would…
Permalink
In reply to First I am not saying I don… by Glen Harrod (not verified)
I agree, more details would be nice.
Something sounds sus! I…
Permalink
Something sounds sus! I doubt Lucid sold you a Lemon. There are so many laws and regulations, I doubt it. I suspect this guy tried the consumer financial protection and was turned down because it is a sham case. Come on man, stop abusing the system. It makes honest consumers look bad.
Hopefully the truth is…
Permalink
In reply to Something sounds sus! I… by tony S (not verified)
Hopefully the truth is uncovered.
The accident didn't show up…
Permalink
The accident didn't show up on the Carfax?
I know this case well and…
Permalink
I know this case well and just wanted to point this out: most Lucid owners I know praise Lucid’s customer service as second to none, offering an exceptional after-sales experience. However, this individual claims to have interacted with several people—“Mohammad in sales, Hudson the sales manager, Angus in customer service, and now Bill Bragger, the head of customer service”—and yet describes all of them as a “complete joke.” Is he implying they ignored him?
He purchased his 2022 GT in October 2024 as a "demo unit" with 6,000 miles on it. That makes it a two-year-old car, not brand new, and it came with a significant discount. There’s no evidence the car has been in an accident—the Carfax was clean, and there were no police or DMV reports. Still, he insists otherwise, citing thicker paint on the hood and a couple of rock chips that any car with that mileage would likely have. (For context, these reports are tied to the VIN, regardless of whether the car is titled or not, and any accident damage exceeding $500 must be reported per DMV regulations.)
This issue has dragged on for months, with him repeatedly threatening legal action against Lucid but never following through. To me, this suggests his claim isn’t credible and that he’s wasting everyone’s time, including Lucid’s customer service team.
I’ve seen similar cases where people try to blackmail the company with legal threats over issues like bubbles in their tires from hitting potholes or cracked rims, insisting it’s Lucid’s fault. It doesn’t work that way!
In my opinion—and this is just common sense—Lucid is a multi-billion-dollar company that values its reputation. If they were at fault, they’d address it immediately. But for baseless claims, they have no problem standing their ground, which is exactly what I see happening here. Just my opinion!